Message ID | 20220511071907.29120-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix return type of t7xx_dl_add_timedout() | expand |
On 5/11/2022 12:19 AM, YueHaibing wrote: > t7xx_dl_add_timedout() now return int 'ret', but the return type > is bool. Change the return type to int for furthor errcode upstream. > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c > index c8bf6929af51..8ee15af1a1ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ unsigned int t7xx_dpmaif_dl_dlq_pit_get_wr_idx(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info, > return value & DPMAIF_DL_RD_WR_IDX_MSK; > } > > -static bool t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info) > +static int t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info) yes, int is the right return type, thanks! > { > u32 value; > int ret;
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 17:35 -0700, Martinez, Ricardo wrote: > On 5/11/2022 12:19 AM, YueHaibing wrote: > > t7xx_dl_add_timedout() now return int 'ret', but the return type > > is bool. Change the return type to int for furthor errcode upstream. > > > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c > > index c8bf6929af51..8ee15af1a1ce 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c > > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ unsigned int t7xx_dpmaif_dl_dlq_pit_get_wr_idx(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info, > > return value & DPMAIF_DL_RD_WR_IDX_MSK; > > } > > > > -static bool t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info) > > +static int t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info) > yes, int is the right return type, thanks! > Changing the return type without using the different error code in the caller is quite useless. Additionally t7xx_dl_add_timedout() (via ioread32_poll_timeout_atomic()) can produce a single error value (ETIMEOUT). IMHO this change is not needed. You may want to remove the 'ret' local variable instead (in the same function) Cheers, Paolo
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c index c8bf6929af51..8ee15af1a1ce 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ unsigned int t7xx_dpmaif_dl_dlq_pit_get_wr_idx(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info, return value & DPMAIF_DL_RD_WR_IDX_MSK; } -static bool t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info) +static int t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info) { u32 value; int ret;
t7xx_dl_add_timedout() now return int 'ret', but the return type is bool. Change the return type to int for furthor errcode upstream. Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> --- drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)