From patchwork Thu May 12 07:45:44 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 12847271 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C854C43219 for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351171AbiELHr1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 03:47:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50070 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351167AbiELHrW (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 03:47:22 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F411B214C; Thu, 12 May 2022 00:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24C6BqbD020435; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:29 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=zW69QzzKdn6pdlFyINgDJeQ9IV/TqDbLws5a/2XMiXE=; b=ZhY5eK31LX3VyXlJFEdNTR9JQo3IcDVlFYuyCvwCgKgMJAoQ6GECYjVbmNv1HzReOE4l djNgr7mCS5yxsHviuvq1CpeEDZ0mzSFQUXQ0ZoxrFjNR0ge3bll10Ic2UOIAcLRM6RxW j/qtQWj0HqdC3Thfs4QQKil2OeAPSCnl/P+H06N55sYfT/+BxtNxjoni344K2p3rOkCE yqhIC1RJS+Ag8KzIPWfaPa5DsfqMLspMrnFDhhtISDlwOx0580hqQg/dy05qD539vyUR JSYusyfCvaoYPowRTv76cTqCRdrE7BhbMVnhCk6CNqgpGS/Gon/Riw0eZHJN/Grzy+aS Og== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g0vrnhpgn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:29 +0000 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24C7fQAK003894; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:28 GMT Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g0vrnhpg2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:28 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24C7cDU3028748; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:26 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3fwgd8w5qu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:26 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 24C7kNE344368192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:23 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1132A4051; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC729A404D; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.211.109.30]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:46:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev Cc: Michael Ellerman , "Naveen N. Rao" , Christophe Leroy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Jordan Niethe Subject: [PATCH 3/5] bpf ppc64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:15:44 +0530 Message-Id: <20220512074546.231616-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220512074546.231616-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220512074546.231616-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: dq8kMBU5arO40FMNmGDzMnS6KZZX_aAy X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xxorlEwL9ikIAJ6ni7lLw8Rh_YesTnoT X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-11_07,2022-05-12_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205120034 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc64, both of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0. BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg); Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 504fa459f9f3..df9e20b22ccb 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -783,6 +783,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * */ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: + u32 save_reg = tmp2_reg; + u32 ret_reg = src_reg; + /* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off)); tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; @@ -813,6 +816,24 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); break; + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + /* + * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG & + * in src_reg for other cases. + */ + ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0); + + /* Compare with old value in BPF_R0 */ + if (size == BPF_DW) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg)); + else + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg)); + /* Don't set if different from old value */ + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4); + fallthrough; + case BPF_XCHG: + save_reg = src_reg; + break; default: pr_err_ratelimited( "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", @@ -822,15 +843,14 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * /* store new value */ if (size == BPF_DW) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); /* we're done if this succeeded */ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); - /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old value into src_reg */ if (imm & BPF_FETCH) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, _R0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, _R0)); break; /*