From patchwork Mon May 30 09:28:12 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 12864474 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956EFC433FE for ; Mon, 30 May 2022 08:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234527AbiE3I6i (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2022 04:58:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52986 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232925AbiE3I6e (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2022 04:58:34 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A714E762B6; Mon, 30 May 2022 01:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500024.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LBTl3331kzQkHK; Mon, 30 May 2022 16:55:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500019.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.180) by dggpemm500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:32 +0800 Received: from k04.huawei.com (10.67.174.115) by dggpemm500019.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:31 +0800 From: Pu Lehui To: , , , CC: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Luke Nelson , Xi Wang , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] bpf: Correct the comment about insn_to_jit_off Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 17:28:12 +0800 Message-ID: <20220530092815.1112406-4-pulehui@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220530092815.1112406-1-pulehui@huawei.com> References: <20220530092815.1112406-1-pulehui@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.115] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemm500019.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.180) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net The insn_to_jit_off passed to bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo should be the first byte of the next instruction, or the byte off to the end of the current instruction. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui --- kernel/bpf/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 13e9dbeeedf3..197fad955c46 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ void bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(struct bpf_prog *prog) * here is relative to the prog itself instead of the main prog. * This array has one entry for each xlated bpf insn. * - * jited_off is the byte off to the last byte of the jited insn. + * jited_off is the byte off to the end of the jited insn. * * Hence, with * insn_start: