Message ID | 20220530092815.1112406-6-pulehui@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | Support riscv jit to provide | expand |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c index ba5bde53d418..e6612f2bd0cf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c @@ -6550,8 +6550,8 @@ static int test_get_linfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test, info.nr_jited_line_info, jited_cnt, info.line_info_rec_size, rec_size, info.jited_line_info_rec_size, jited_rec_size, - (void *)(long)info.line_info, - (void *)(long)info.jited_line_info)) { + (void *)(unsigned long)info.line_info, + (void *)(unsigned long)info.jited_line_info)) { err = -1; goto done; }
The members of bpf_prog_info, which are line_info and jited_line_info store u64 address pointed to the corresponding memory regions. Memory addresses are conceptually unsigned, (unsigned long) casting makes more sense, so let's make a change for conceptual uniformity. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)