Message ID | 20220623124221.18238-1-paul@crapouillou.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] brcmfmac: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
On 6/23/2022 2:42 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Use the new DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr() macros to > handle the .suspend/.resume callbacks. > > These macros allow the suspend and resume functions to be automatically > dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_SUSPEND is disabled, without having > to use #ifdef guards. > > Some other functions not directly called by the .suspend/.resume > callbacks, but still related to PM were also taken outside #ifdef > guards. > > The advantage is then that these functions are now always compiled > independently of any Kconfig option, and thanks to that bugs and > regressions are easier to catch. Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> > --- > > Notes: > v2: > - Move checks for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) inside functions to keep > the calling functions intact. > - Reword the commit message to explain why this patch is useful. > > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 38 +++++++------------ > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 5 +-- > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 16 -------- > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c > index 9c598ea97499..11ad878a906b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c > @@ -784,9 +784,11 @@ void brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) > sdiodev->txglomsz = sdiodev->settings->bus.sdio.txglomsz; > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > static int brcmf_sdiod_freezer_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) > { > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) > + return 0; > + > sdiodev->freezer = kzalloc(sizeof(*sdiodev->freezer), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!sdiodev->freezer) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -799,7 +801,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_freezer_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) > > static void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_detach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) > { > - if (sdiodev->freezer) { > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && sdiodev->freezer) { This change is not necessary. sdiodev->freezer will be NULL when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled. > WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sdiodev->freezer->freezing)); > kfree(sdiodev->freezer); > }
On 6/24/2022 2:24 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 6/23/2022 2:42 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: [snip] >> - if (sdiodev->freezer) { >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && sdiodev->freezer) { > > This change is not necessary. sdiodev->freezer will be NULL when > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled. but won't the compiler be able to completely optimize the code away if the change is present?
Hi, Le ven., juin 24 2022 at 09:31:22 -0700, Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> a écrit : > On 6/24/2022 2:24 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> On 6/23/2022 2:42 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > [snip] > >>> - if (sdiodev->freezer) { >>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && sdiodev->freezer) { >> >> This change is not necessary. sdiodev->freezer will be NULL when >> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled. > > but won't the compiler be able to completely optimize the code away > if the change is present? That's correct. But do we want to complexify a bit the code for the sake of saving a few bytes? I leave that as an open question to the maintainer, I'm really fine with both options. Cheers, -Paul
On 6/24/2022 11:32 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Hi, > > Le ven., juin 24 2022 at 09:31:22 -0700, Jeff Johnson > <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> a écrit : >> On 6/24/2022 2:24 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >>> On 6/23/2022 2:42 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> - if (sdiodev->freezer) { >>>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && sdiodev->freezer) { >>> >>> This change is not necessary. sdiodev->freezer will be NULL when >>> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled. >> >> but won't the compiler be able to completely optimize the code away if >> the change is present? > > That's correct. But do we want to complexify a bit the code for the sake > of saving a few bytes? I leave that as an open question to the > maintainer, I'm really fine with both options. I'm fine either way as well. I'd have stronger opinions if ath drivers were involved ;)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c index 9c598ea97499..11ad878a906b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c @@ -784,9 +784,11 @@ void brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) sdiodev->txglomsz = sdiodev->settings->bus.sdio.txglomsz; } -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static int brcmf_sdiod_freezer_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) { + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) + return 0; + sdiodev->freezer = kzalloc(sizeof(*sdiodev->freezer), GFP_KERNEL); if (!sdiodev->freezer) return -ENOMEM; @@ -799,7 +801,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_freezer_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) static void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_detach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) { - if (sdiodev->freezer) { + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && sdiodev->freezer) { WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sdiodev->freezer->freezing)); kfree(sdiodev->freezer); } @@ -833,7 +835,8 @@ static void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_off(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) bool brcmf_sdiod_freezing(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) { - return atomic_read(&sdiodev->freezer->freezing); + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && + atomic_read(&sdiodev->freezer->freezing); } void brcmf_sdiod_try_freeze(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) @@ -847,24 +850,16 @@ void brcmf_sdiod_try_freeze(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_count(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) { - atomic_inc(&sdiodev->freezer->thread_count); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) + atomic_inc(&sdiodev->freezer->thread_count); } void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_uncount(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) { - atomic_dec(&sdiodev->freezer->thread_count); -} -#else -static int brcmf_sdiod_freezer_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) -{ - return 0; + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) + atomic_dec(&sdiodev->freezer->thread_count); } -static void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_detach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) -{ -} -#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ - int brcmf_sdiod_remove(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) { sdiodev->state = BRCMF_SDIOD_DOWN; @@ -1136,7 +1131,6 @@ void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled) brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "WOWL not supported\n"); } -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev) { struct sdio_func *func; @@ -1204,11 +1198,9 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev) return ret; } -static const struct dev_pm_ops brcmf_sdio_pm_ops = { - .suspend = brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend, - .resume = brcmf_ops_sdio_resume, -}; -#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmf_sdio_pm_ops, + brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend, + brcmf_ops_sdio_resume); static struct sdio_driver brcmf_sdmmc_driver = { .probe = brcmf_ops_sdio_probe, @@ -1217,9 +1209,7 @@ static struct sdio_driver brcmf_sdmmc_driver = { .id_table = brcmf_sdmmc_ids, .drv = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP - .pm = &brcmf_sdio_pm_ops, -#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ + .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&brcmf_sdio_pm_ops), .coredump = brcmf_dev_coredump, }, }; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c index 212fbbe1cd7e..58ed6b70f8c5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c @@ -4020,15 +4020,14 @@ brcmf_sdio_probe_attach(struct brcmf_sdio *bus) */ brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc(sdiodev); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP /* wowl can be supported when KEEP_POWER is true and (WAKE_SDIO_IRQ * is true or when platform data OOB irq is true). */ - if ((sdio_get_host_pm_caps(sdiodev->func1) & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER) && + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && + (sdio_get_host_pm_caps(sdiodev->func1) & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER) && ((sdio_get_host_pm_caps(sdiodev->func1) & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ) || (sdiodev->settings->bus.sdio.oob_irq_supported))) sdiodev->bus_if->wowl_supported = true; -#endif if (brcmf_sdio_kso_init(bus)) { brcmf_err("error enabling KSO\n"); diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h index 15d2c02fa3ec..47351ff458ca 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h @@ -346,26 +346,10 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_abort(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev, struct sdio_func *func); void brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev); void brcmf_sdiod_change_state(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev, enum brcmf_sdiod_state state); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP bool brcmf_sdiod_freezing(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev); void brcmf_sdiod_try_freeze(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev); void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_count(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev); void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_uncount(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev); -#else -static inline bool brcmf_sdiod_freezing(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) -{ - return false; -} -static inline void brcmf_sdiod_try_freeze(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) -{ -} -static inline void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_count(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) -{ -} -static inline void brcmf_sdiod_freezer_uncount(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) -{ -} -#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ int brcmf_sdiod_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev); int brcmf_sdiod_remove(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
Use the new DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr() macros to handle the .suspend/.resume callbacks. These macros allow the suspend and resume functions to be automatically dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_SUSPEND is disabled, without having to use #ifdef guards. Some other functions not directly called by the .suspend/.resume callbacks, but still related to PM were also taken outside #ifdef guards. The advantage is then that these functions are now always compiled independently of any Kconfig option, and thanks to that bugs and regressions are easier to catch. Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> --- Notes: v2: - Move checks for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) inside functions to keep the calling functions intact. - Reword the commit message to explain why this patch is useful. .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 38 +++++++------------ .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 5 +-- .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 16 -------- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)