From patchwork Sat Jun 25 16:12:52 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xu Kuohai X-Patchwork-Id: 12895398 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B22C43334 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233184AbiFYQCx (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:02:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229492AbiFYQCu (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:02:50 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E508515A2A; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LVdzM0VRzzDsNT; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:02:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.197) by kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:02:43 +0800 From: Xu Kuohai To: , , , CC: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Zi Shen Lim , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , "David S . Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , "H . Peter Anvin" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Russell King , James Morse , Hou Tao , Jason Wang Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:12:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20220625161255.547944-2-xukuohai@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20220625161255.547944-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> References: <20220625161255.547944-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.197] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Before generating bpf trampoline, x86 calls is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to check the input flags. This check is architecture independent. So, to be consistent with x86, arm64 should also do this check before generating bpf trampoline. However, the BPF_TRAMP_F_XXX flags are not used by user code and the flags argument is almost constant at copmile time, so this run time check is a bit redundant. Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() and add some comments to the usage of BPF_TRAMP_F_XXX flags, as suggested by Alexei. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai Acked-by: Song Liu --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 -------------------- kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 3 +++ kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 2c51ca9f7cec..4f8938db03b1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1927,23 +1927,6 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, return 0; } -static bool is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(unsigned int flags) -{ - if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) && - (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME)) - return false; - - /* - * BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops, - * and it must be used alone. - */ - if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET) && - (flags & ~BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET)) - return false; - - return true; -} - /* Example: * __be16 eth_type_trans(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev); * its 'struct btf_func_model' will be nr_args=2 @@ -2022,9 +2005,6 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i if (nr_args > 6) return -ENOTSUPP; - if (!is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(flags)) - return -EINVAL; - /* Generated trampoline stack layout: * * RBP + 8 [ return address ] diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c index 7e0068c3399c..84b2d9dba79a 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c @@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].links[0] = link; tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].nr_links = 1; + /* BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops, + * and it must be used alone. + */ flags = model->ret_size > 0 ? BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET : 0; return arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(NULL, image, image_end, model, flags, tlinks, NULL); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c index 93c7675f0c9e..bd3f2e673874 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c @@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr) if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links || tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links) + /* NOTE: BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS and BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME + * should not be set together. + */ flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME; if (ip_arg)