| Message ID | 20220627121626.1595732-1-imagedong@tencent.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | d640516a65d8bec3e5f9ddccc3e15503277c7cbb |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net-next] net: mptcp: fix some spelling mistake in mptcp | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Single patches do not need cover letters |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4 |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 8 of 8 maintainers |
| netdev/build_clang | success | Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6 |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| netdev/check_selftest | success | No net selftest shell script |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4 |
| netdev/checkpatch | warning | WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
Hi Menglong Dong, On 27/06/2022 14:16, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote: > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> > > codespell finds some spelling mistake in mptcp: > > net/mptcp/subflow.c:1624: interaces ==> interfaces > net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1130: regarless ==> regardless > > Just fix them. Thank you for this fix. Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Cheers, Matt
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:16:25 +0800 you wrote: > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> > > codespell finds some spelling mistake in mptcp: > > net/mptcp/subflow.c:1624: interaces ==> interfaces > net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1130: regarless ==> regardless > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next] net: mptcp: fix some spelling mistake in mptcp https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d640516a65d8 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index e099f2a12504..3de83e2a2611 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss } unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow); - /* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections: + /* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections: * we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection * is cheap under the msk socket lock */ diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 654cc602ff2c..8c3e699d3387 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock) /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the - * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct + * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct * user. */ SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino;