Message ID | 20220708042736.669132-1-pulehui@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | fb8ddf24c71dc97d6b07ecb7791b4fa5e7f48efc |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next] bpf, docs: Remove deprecated xsk libbpf APIs description | expand |
> On Jul 7, 2022, at 9:27 PM, Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> wrote: > > Since xsk APIs has been removed from libbpf, let's clean > up the bpf docs simutaneously. > > Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> > --- > .../bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst | 13 ++----------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst b/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst > index f86360f734a8..c5ac97f3d4c4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst > +++ b/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ described here. It's recommended to follow these conventions whenever a > new function or type is added to keep libbpf API clean and consistent. > > All types and functions provided by libbpf API should have one of the > -following prefixes: ``bpf_``, ``btf_``, ``libbpf_``, ``xsk_``, > -``btf_dump_``, ``ring_buffer_``, ``perf_buffer_``. > +following prefixes: ``bpf_``, ``btf_``, ``libbpf_``, ``btf_dump_``, > +``ring_buffer_``, ``perf_buffer_``. > > System call wrappers > -------------------- > @@ -59,15 +59,6 @@ Auxiliary functions and types that don't fit well in any of categories > described above should have ``libbpf_`` prefix, e.g. > ``libbpf_get_error`` or ``libbpf_prog_type_by_name``. > > -AF_XDP functions > -------------------- > - > -AF_XDP functions should have an ``xsk_`` prefix, e.g. > -``xsk_umem__get_data`` or ``xsk_umem__create``. The interface consists > -of both low-level ring access functions and high-level configuration > -functions. These can be mixed and matched. Note that these functions > -are not reentrant for performance reasons. > - > ABI > --- > > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>: On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 12:27:36 +0800 you wrote: > Since xsk APIs has been removed from libbpf, let's clean > up the bpf docs simutaneously. > > Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> > --- > .../bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst | 13 ++----------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] bpf, docs: Remove deprecated xsk libbpf APIs description https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fb8ddf24c71d You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst b/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst index f86360f734a8..c5ac97f3d4c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst +++ b/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ described here. It's recommended to follow these conventions whenever a new function or type is added to keep libbpf API clean and consistent. All types and functions provided by libbpf API should have one of the -following prefixes: ``bpf_``, ``btf_``, ``libbpf_``, ``xsk_``, -``btf_dump_``, ``ring_buffer_``, ``perf_buffer_``. +following prefixes: ``bpf_``, ``btf_``, ``libbpf_``, ``btf_dump_``, +``ring_buffer_``, ``perf_buffer_``. System call wrappers -------------------- @@ -59,15 +59,6 @@ Auxiliary functions and types that don't fit well in any of categories described above should have ``libbpf_`` prefix, e.g. ``libbpf_get_error`` or ``libbpf_prog_type_by_name``. -AF_XDP functions -------------------- - -AF_XDP functions should have an ``xsk_`` prefix, e.g. -``xsk_umem__get_data`` or ``xsk_umem__create``. The interface consists -of both low-level ring access functions and high-level configuration -functions. These can be mixed and matched. Note that these functions -are not reentrant for performance reasons. - ABI ---
Since xsk APIs has been removed from libbpf, let's clean up the bpf docs simutaneously. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> --- .../bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)