Message ID | 20220715130430.160029-2-marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | ice: PPPoE offload support | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
netdev/build_32bit | fail | Errors and warnings before: 5637 this patch: 5645 |
netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 7 of 7 maintainers |
netdev/build_clang | success | Errors and warnings before: 1191 this patch: 1191 |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
netdev/check_selftest | success | No net selftest shell script |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | fail | Errors and warnings before: 5791 this patch: 5799 |
netdev/checkpatch | warning | WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 7 this patch: 7 |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Marcin Szycik wrote: > +/** > + * is_ppp_proto_supported - checks if inner PPP protocol should be dissected > + * @proto: protocol type (PPP proto field) > + */ > +static bool is_ppp_proto_supported(__be16 proto) > +{ > + switch (proto) { > + case htons(PPP_AT): > + case htons(PPP_IPX): > + case htons(PPP_VJC_COMP): > + case htons(PPP_VJC_UNCOMP): > + case htons(PPP_MP): > + case htons(PPP_COMPFRAG): > + case htons(PPP_COMP): > + case htons(PPP_IPCP): > + case htons(PPP_ATCP): > + case htons(PPP_IPXCP): > + case htons(PPP_IPV6CP): > + case htons(PPP_CCPFRAG): > + case htons(PPP_MPLSCP): > + case htons(PPP_LCP): > + case htons(PPP_PAP): > + case htons(PPP_LQR): > + case htons(PPP_CHAP): > + case htons(PPP_CBCP): > + return true; > + default: > + return false; > + } > +} The more I think about it, the more I believe we should make this function more generic by following the Protocol field definition found in section 2 of RFC 1661: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1661#section-2 I mean, it's very surprising that is_ppp_proto_supported() returns false for protocols like PPP_IP or PPP_IPV6, which certainly are supported. Of course, in the context of your patch, PPP_IP and PPP_IPV6 have been tested first, but that makes the code a bit unclear. We could define a simpler and more generic helper function (probably in a ppp header file). Something like (unstested): /* Assumes proto isn't compressed. */ static bool ppp_proto_is_valid(u16 proto) /* { /* Protocol must be odd and the least significant bit of the * most significant octet must be 0 (see RFC 1661, section 2). */ return !!(proto & 0X0101 == 0x0001) } BTW, we don't have to restrict the list of supported protocols to the PPP_* numbers defined in the kernel as we have no indication that the PPP frame is going to be handled locally. > +static bool is_pppoe_ses_hdr_valid(struct pppoe_hdr hdr) > +{ > + return hdr.ver == 1 && hdr.type == 1 && hdr.code == 0; > +} > + > /** > * __skb_flow_dissect - extract the flow_keys struct and return it > * @net: associated network namespace, derived from @skb if NULL > @@ -1214,26 +1250,61 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net, > struct pppoe_hdr hdr; > __be16 proto; > } *hdr, _hdr; > + u16 ppp_proto; > + > hdr = __skb_header_pointer(skb, nhoff, sizeof(_hdr), data, hlen, &_hdr); > if (!hdr) { > fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD; > break; > } > > - nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN; > - switch (hdr->proto) { > - case htons(PPP_IP): > + if (!is_pppoe_ses_hdr_valid(hdr->hdr)) { > + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD; > + break; > + } > + > + /* least significant bit of the least significant octet That's the least significant bit of the _most significant_ octet (the one of the least significant octet must always be 1). > + * indicates if protocol field was compressed > + */ > + ppp_proto = ntohs(hdr->proto); > + if (ppp_proto & 256) { Using hex would improve readability in my opinion (that is, s/256/0x0100/). > + ppp_proto = htons(ppp_proto >> 8); I don't get why you convert ppp_proto back to network byte order. That contradicts the type annotation (u16). > + nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN - 1; > + } else { > + ppp_proto = htons(ppp_proto); Same here. We could leave ppp_proto untouched in this branch. > + nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN; > + } > + > + if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IP)) { With ppp_proto kept in host byte order, the htons() call would need to go. > proto = htons(ETH_P_IP); > fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; > - break; > - case htons(PPP_IPV6): > + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IPV6)) { Same here, and in the following 'if' branches. > proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6); > fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; > - break; > - default: > + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_UC)) { > + proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC); > + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; > + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_MC)) { > + proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_MC); > + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; > + } else if (is_ppp_proto_supported(ppp_proto)) { > + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_GOOD; > + } else { > fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD; > break; > } > + > + if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, > + FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE)) { > + struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe *key_pppoe; > + > + key_pppoe = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector, > + FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE, > + target_container); > + key_pppoe->session_id = hdr->hdr.sid; > + key_pppoe->ppp_proto = ppp_proto; With ppp_proto being u16, we'd now need to call htons(ppp_proto). > + key_pppoe->type = htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES); > + } > break; > } > case htons(ETH_P_TIPC): { > -- > 2.35.1 >
diff --git a/include/net/flow_dissector.h b/include/net/flow_dissector.h index 0f9544a9bb9e..6c74812d64b2 100644 --- a/include/net/flow_dissector.h +++ b/include/net/flow_dissector.h @@ -277,6 +277,18 @@ struct flow_dissector_key_num_of_vlans { u8 num_of_vlans; }; +/** + * struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe: + * @session_id: pppoe session id + * @ppp_proto: ppp protocol + * @type: pppoe eth type + */ +struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe { + __be16 session_id; + __be16 ppp_proto; + __be16 type; +}; + enum flow_dissector_key_id { FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL, /* struct flow_dissector_key_control */ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_BASIC, /* struct flow_dissector_key_basic */ @@ -307,6 +319,7 @@ enum flow_dissector_key_id { FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CT, /* struct flow_dissector_key_ct */ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_HASH, /* struct flow_dissector_key_hash */ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_NUM_OF_VLANS, /* struct flow_dissector_key_num_of_vlans */ + FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE, /* struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe */ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_MAX, }; diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c index 6aee04f75e3e..e3dfc9e5d095 100644 --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c @@ -895,6 +895,42 @@ bool bpf_flow_dissect(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_flow_dissector *ctx, return result == BPF_OK; } +/** + * is_ppp_proto_supported - checks if inner PPP protocol should be dissected + * @proto: protocol type (PPP proto field) + */ +static bool is_ppp_proto_supported(__be16 proto) +{ + switch (proto) { + case htons(PPP_AT): + case htons(PPP_IPX): + case htons(PPP_VJC_COMP): + case htons(PPP_VJC_UNCOMP): + case htons(PPP_MP): + case htons(PPP_COMPFRAG): + case htons(PPP_COMP): + case htons(PPP_IPCP): + case htons(PPP_ATCP): + case htons(PPP_IPXCP): + case htons(PPP_IPV6CP): + case htons(PPP_CCPFRAG): + case htons(PPP_MPLSCP): + case htons(PPP_LCP): + case htons(PPP_PAP): + case htons(PPP_LQR): + case htons(PPP_CHAP): + case htons(PPP_CBCP): + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} + +static bool is_pppoe_ses_hdr_valid(struct pppoe_hdr hdr) +{ + return hdr.ver == 1 && hdr.type == 1 && hdr.code == 0; +} + /** * __skb_flow_dissect - extract the flow_keys struct and return it * @net: associated network namespace, derived from @skb if NULL @@ -1214,26 +1250,61 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net, struct pppoe_hdr hdr; __be16 proto; } *hdr, _hdr; + u16 ppp_proto; + hdr = __skb_header_pointer(skb, nhoff, sizeof(_hdr), data, hlen, &_hdr); if (!hdr) { fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD; break; } - nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN; - switch (hdr->proto) { - case htons(PPP_IP): + if (!is_pppoe_ses_hdr_valid(hdr->hdr)) { + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD; + break; + } + + /* least significant bit of the least significant octet + * indicates if protocol field was compressed + */ + ppp_proto = ntohs(hdr->proto); + if (ppp_proto & 256) { + ppp_proto = htons(ppp_proto >> 8); + nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN - 1; + } else { + ppp_proto = htons(ppp_proto); + nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN; + } + + if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IP)) { proto = htons(ETH_P_IP); fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; - break; - case htons(PPP_IPV6): + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IPV6)) { proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6); fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; - break; - default: + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_UC)) { + proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC); + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_MC)) { + proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_MC); + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN; + } else if (is_ppp_proto_supported(ppp_proto)) { + fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_GOOD; + } else { fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD; break; } + + if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, + FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE)) { + struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe *key_pppoe; + + key_pppoe = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector, + FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE, + target_container); + key_pppoe->session_id = hdr->hdr.sid; + key_pppoe->ppp_proto = ppp_proto; + key_pppoe->type = htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES); + } break; } case htons(ETH_P_TIPC): {