diff mbox series

[5/5] xfrm: improve wording of comment above XFRM_OFFLOAD flags

Message ID 20220720081746.1187382-6-steffen.klassert@secunet.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [1/5] xfrm: no need to set DST_NOPOLICY in IPv4 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Pull request is its own cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 4817 this patch: 4817
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 4 of 4 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1171 this patch: 1171
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 4972 this patch: 4972
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Steffen Klassert July 20, 2022, 8:17 a.m. UTC 
From: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>

I have noticed a few minor wording issues in a comment recently added
above XFRM_OFFLOAD flags in 7c76ecd9c99b ("xfrm: enforce validity of
offload input flags").

Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
index 3ed61df9cc91..7929bf9cbee4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
@@ -511,9 +511,9 @@  struct xfrm_user_offload {
 	int				ifindex;
 	__u8				flags;
 };
-/* This flag was exposed without any kernel code that supporting it.
- * Unfortunately, strongswan has the code that uses sets this flag,
- * which makes impossible to reuse this bit.
+/* This flag was exposed without any kernel code that supports it.
+ * Unfortunately, strongswan has the code that sets this flag,
+ * which makes it impossible to reuse this bit.
  *
  * So leave it here to make sure that it won't be reused by mistake.
  */