@@ -979,18 +979,29 @@ int bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id)
return bpf_map_get_fd_by_id_opts(id, NULL);
}
-int bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id)
+int bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id_opts(__u32 id,
+ const struct bpf_get_fd_opts *opts)
{
union bpf_attr attr;
int fd;
+ if (!OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_get_fd_opts))
+ return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
+
memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
attr.btf_id = id;
+ if (kernel_supports(NULL, FEAT_GET_FD_BY_ID_OPEN_FLAGS))
+ attr.open_flags = OPTS_GET(opts, flags, 0);
fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID, &attr, sizeof(attr));
return libbpf_err_errno(fd);
}
+int bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id)
+{
+ return bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id_opts(id, NULL);
+}
+
int bpf_link_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id)
{
union bpf_attr attr;
@@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_get_fd_by_id_opts(__u32 id,
const struct bpf_get_fd_opts *opts);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id_opts(__u32 id,
+ const struct bpf_get_fd_opts *opts);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_link_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(int bpf_fd, void *info, __u32 *info_len);
@@ -366,4 +366,5 @@ LIBBPF_1.0.0 {
perf_buffer__buffer;
bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id_opts;
bpf_map_get_fd_by_id_opts;
+ bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id_opts;
};
Introduce bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id_opts(), to let the caller specify the needed permissions for the operation. Keep the existing bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id() function, to request read-write permissions. Currently, setting permissions in the data structure has no effect, as the kernel does not evaluate them. The new variant has been introduced anyway for symmetry with bpf_map_get_fd_by_id_opts(). Evaluating permissions could be done in future kernel versions. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 13 ++++++++++++- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 ++ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 1 + 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)