| Message ID | 20220725085130.11553-1-memxor@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 6e116280b41b0cbfd90dfe9fa66e07ff348d50d5 |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bpf-next] net: netfilter: Remove ifdefs for code shared by BPF and ctnetlink | expand |
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 10:51, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> wrote: > > The current ifdefry for code shared by the BPF and ctnetlink side looks > ugly. As per Pablo's request, simplify this by unconditionally compiling > in the code. This can be revisited when the shared code between the two > grows further. > > Suggested-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > --- Pablo, presumably this needs your ack before it can be applied, as it is marked Needs Ack in patchwork. > include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h | 6 ------ > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 6 ------ > 2 files changed, 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h > index 3cd3a6e631aa..b2b9de70d9f4 100644 > --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h > +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h > @@ -86,10 +86,6 @@ extern spinlock_t nf_conntrack_expect_lock; > > /* ctnetlink code shared by both ctnetlink and nf_conntrack_bpf */ > > -#if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF)) || \ > - (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES) || \ > - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK)) > - > static inline void __nf_ct_set_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct, u64 timeout) > { > if (timeout > INT_MAX) > @@ -101,6 +97,4 @@ int __nf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct, u64 cta_timeout); > void __nf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned long on, unsigned long off); > int nf_ct_change_status_common(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int status); > > -#endif > - > #endif /* _NF_CONNTRACK_CORE_H */ > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > index 66a0aa8dbc3b..afe02772c010 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > @@ -2787,10 +2787,6 @@ int nf_conntrack_init_net(struct net *net) > return ret; > } > > -#if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF)) || \ > - (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES) || \ > - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK)) > - > /* ctnetlink code shared by both ctnetlink and nf_conntrack_bpf */ > > int __nf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct, u64 timeout) > @@ -2846,5 +2842,3 @@ int nf_ct_change_status_common(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int status) > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_change_status_common); > - > -#endif > -- > 2.34.1 >
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>: On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:51:30 +0200 you wrote: > The current ifdefry for code shared by the BPF and ctnetlink side looks > ugly. As per Pablo's request, simplify this by unconditionally compiling > in the code. This can be revisited when the shared code between the two > grows further. > > Suggested-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] net: netfilter: Remove ifdefs for code shared by BPF and ctnetlink https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6e116280b41b You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h index 3cd3a6e631aa..b2b9de70d9f4 100644 --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h @@ -86,10 +86,6 @@ extern spinlock_t nf_conntrack_expect_lock; /* ctnetlink code shared by both ctnetlink and nf_conntrack_bpf */ -#if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF)) || \ - (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES) || \ - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK)) - static inline void __nf_ct_set_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct, u64 timeout) { if (timeout > INT_MAX) @@ -101,6 +97,4 @@ int __nf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct, u64 cta_timeout); void __nf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned long on, unsigned long off); int nf_ct_change_status_common(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int status); -#endif - #endif /* _NF_CONNTRACK_CORE_H */ diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c index 66a0aa8dbc3b..afe02772c010 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c @@ -2787,10 +2787,6 @@ int nf_conntrack_init_net(struct net *net) return ret; } -#if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF)) || \ - (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES) || \ - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK)) - /* ctnetlink code shared by both ctnetlink and nf_conntrack_bpf */ int __nf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct, u64 timeout) @@ -2846,5 +2842,3 @@ int nf_ct_change_status_common(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int status) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_change_status_common); - -#endif
The current ifdefry for code shared by the BPF and ctnetlink side looks ugly. As per Pablo's request, simplify this by unconditionally compiling in the code. This can be revisited when the shared code between the two grows further. Suggested-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h | 6 ------ net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 6 ------ 2 files changed, 12 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1