diff mbox series

[V2,next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful" (kfunc_call.c)

Message ID 20220817213242.101277-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e918cd231ee6f1dc969e71718ed11c71e98f5c4c
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [V2,next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful" (kfunc_call.c) | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 fail Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Colin Ian King Aug. 17, 2022, 9:32 p.m. UTC
There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK literal string. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
V2: change subject line as per Mykola Lysenko's recommendation
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mykola Lysenko Aug. 18, 2022, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #1
Acked-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>

> On Aug 17, 2022, at 2:32 PM, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  This Message Is From an External Sender
> 
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
> 
> There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK literal string. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: change subject line as per Mykola Lysenko's recommendation
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
> index 351fafa006fb..eede7c304f86 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void test_destructive(void)
> {
> 	__u64 save_caps = 0;
> 
> -	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "succesful_load");
> +	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "successful_load");
> 
> 	if (!ASSERT_OK(cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_BOOT, &save_caps), "drop_caps"))
> 		return;
> -- 
> 2.37.1
>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 19, 2022, 7:50 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:32:42 +0100 you wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK literal string. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: change subject line as per Mykola Lysenko's recommendation
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - [V2,next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful" (kfunc_call.c)
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e918cd231ee6

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index 351fafa006fb..eede7c304f86 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@  static void test_destructive(void)
 {
 	__u64 save_caps = 0;
 
-	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "succesful_load");
+	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "successful_load");
 
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_BOOT, &save_caps), "drop_caps"))
 		return;