diff mbox series

[v4,net-next,02/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: hellcreek: add missing CPU port phy-mode/fixed-link to example

Message ID 20220818115500.2592578-3-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b975b73425cde436f3e66e4cd992f6e6fb0998e5
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Validate OF nodes for DSA shared ports | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 2 maintainers not CCed: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 12 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Vladimir Oltean Aug. 18, 2022, 11:54 a.m. UTC 
Looking at hellcreek_phylink_get_caps(), I see that depending on whether
is_100_mbits is set, speeds of 1G or of 100M will be advertised. The
de1soc_r1_pdata sets is_100_mbits to true.

The PHY modes declared in the capabilities are MII, RGMII and GMII. GMII
doesn't support 100Mbps, and as for RGMII, it would be a bit implausible
to me to support this PHY mode but limit it to only 25 MHz. So I've
settled on MII as a phy-mode in the example, and a fixed-link of
100Mbps.

As a side note, there exists such a thing as "rev-mii", because the MII
protocol is asymmetric, and "mii" is the designation for the MAC side
(expected to be connected to a PHY), and "rev-mii" is the designation
for the PHY side (expected to be connected to a MAC). I wonder whether
"mii" or "rev-mii" should actually be used here, since this is a CPU
port and presumably connected to another MAC.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
---
v2->v3: patch is new
v3->v4: none

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hirschmann,hellcreek.yaml   | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hirschmann,hellcreek.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hirschmann,hellcreek.yaml
index 228683773151..1ff44dd68a61 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hirschmann,hellcreek.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hirschmann,hellcreek.yaml
@@ -93,6 +93,12 @@  examples:
                     reg = <0>;
                     label = "cpu";
                     ethernet = <&gmac0>;
+                    phy-mode = "mii";
+
+                    fixed-link {
+                        speed = <100>;
+                        full-duplex;
+                    };
                 };
 
                 port@2 {