diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,7/7] selftests/bpf: Use BPF_PROG2 for some fentry programs without struct arguments

Message ID 20220828025515.146020-1-yhs@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Support struct argument for trampoline base progs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 10 maintainers not CCed: shuah@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org haoluo@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org sdf@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 16 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Yonghong Song Aug. 28, 2022, 2:55 a.m. UTC 
Use BPF_PROG2 instead of BPF_PROG for programs in progs/timer.c
to test BPF_PROG2 for cases without struct arguments.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c
index 5f5309791649..560a63e95dc3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@  static int timer_cb1(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
 }
 
 SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
-int BPF_PROG(test1, int a)
+int BPF_PROG2(test1, int, a)
 {
 	struct bpf_timer *arr_timer, *lru_timer;
 	struct elem init = {};
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@  int bpf_timer_test(void)
 }
 
 SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test2")
-int BPF_PROG(test2, int a, int b)
+int BPF_PROG2(test2, int, a, int, b)
 {
 	struct hmap_elem init = {}, *val;
 	int key = HTAB, key_malloc = HTAB_MALLOC;