diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,2/3] bpf: Propagate error from htab_lock_bucket() to userspace

Message ID 20220831042629.130006-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 66a7a92e4d0d091e79148a4c6ec15d1da65f4280
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series fixes for concurrent htab updates | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: song@kernel.org; 2 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 13 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Hou Tao Aug. 31, 2022, 4:26 a.m. UTC 
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

In __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch() if htab_lock_bucket() returns
-EBUSY, it will go to next bucket. Going to next bucket may not only
skip the elements in current bucket silently, but also incur
out-of-bound memory access or expose kernel memory to userspace if
current bucket_cnt is greater than bucket_size or zero.

Fixing it by stopping batch operation and returning -EBUSY when
htab_lock_bucket() fails, and the application can retry or skip the busy
batch as needed.

Fixes: 20b6cc34ea74 ("bpf: Avoid hashtab deadlock with map_locked")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 6fb3b7fd1622..eb1263f03e9b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -1704,8 +1704,11 @@  __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	/* do not grab the lock unless need it (bucket_cnt > 0). */
 	if (locked) {
 		ret = htab_lock_bucket(htab, b, batch, &flags);
-		if (ret)
-			goto next_batch;
+		if (ret) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			bpf_enable_instrumentation();
+			goto after_loop;
+		}
 	}
 
 	bucket_cnt = 0;