Message ID | 20220901040307.4674-1-khalid.masum.92@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] xfrm: Update ipcomp_scratches with NULL if not allocated | expand |
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:03:07AM +0600, Khalid Masum wrote: > > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c > index cb40ff0ff28d..3774d07c5819 100644 > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c > @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void) > vfree(*per_cpu_ptr(scratches, i)); > > free_percpu(scratches); > + ipcomp_scratches = NULL; > } Good catch! This is probably the root cause of all the crashes. > static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) > @@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) > > scratches = alloc_percpu(void *); > if (!scratches) > - return NULL; > + return ipcomp_scratches = NULL; This is unnecessary as with your first hunk, ipcomp_scratches is guaranteed to be NULL. Thanks,
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:18 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:03:07AM +0600, Khalid Masum wrote: > > > > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c > > index cb40ff0ff28d..3774d07c5819 100644 > > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c > > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c > > @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void) > > vfree(*per_cpu_ptr(scratches, i)); > > > > free_percpu(scratches); > > + ipcomp_scratches = NULL; > > } > > Good catch! This is probably the root cause of all the crashes. > > > static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) > > @@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) > > > > scratches = alloc_percpu(void *); > > if (!scratches) > > - return NULL; > > + return ipcomp_scratches = NULL; > > This is unnecessary as with your first hunk, ipcomp_scratches > is guaranteed to be NULL. > > Thanks, > -- You are right. Instead of setting it to NULL at both places, it makes more sense to do it when memory is freed. I shall send a v4 with the suggested change. thanks, -- Khalid Masum
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c index cb40ff0ff28d..3774d07c5819 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void) vfree(*per_cpu_ptr(scratches, i)); free_percpu(scratches); + ipcomp_scratches = NULL; } static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) @@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void) scratches = alloc_percpu(void *); if (!scratches) - return NULL; + return ipcomp_scratches = NULL; ipcomp_scratches = scratches;