diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v10,20/23] selftests/bpf: Add a test for BPF_F_INSERT_HEAD

Message ID 20220902132938.2409206-21-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Introduce eBPF support for HID devices | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 6 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org haoluo@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com sdf@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 200 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Benjamin Tissoires Sept. 2, 2022, 1:29 p.m. UTC
Insert 3 programs to check that we are doing the correct thing:
'2', '1', '3' are inserted, but '1' is supposed to be executed first.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

---

no changes in v10

no changes in v9

no changes in v8

no changes in v7

changes in v6:
- fixed copy/paste in ASSERT_OK and test execution order

changes in v5:
- use the new API

not in v4

changes in v3:
- use the new hid_get_data API

new in v2
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c      |  54 +++++++++-
 2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
index 9dc5f0038472..a86e16554e68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ 
 #include <dirent.h>
 #include <poll.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
+#include <linux/hid_bpf.h>
 #include <linux/hidraw.h>
 #include <linux/uhid.h>
 
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@  static u8 feature_data[] = { 1, 2 };
 struct attach_prog_args {
 	int prog_fd;
 	unsigned int hid;
+	unsigned int flags;
 	int retval;
 };
 
@@ -770,6 +772,109 @@  static int test_hid_user_raw_request_call(int uhid_fd, int dev_id)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Attach hid_insert{0,1,2} to the given uhid device,
+ * retrieve and open the matching hidraw node,
+ * inject one event in the uhid device,
+ * check that the programs have been inserted in the correct order.
+ */
+static int test_hid_attach_flags(int uhid_fd, int dev_id)
+{
+	struct hid *hid_skel = NULL;
+	u8 buf[64] = {0};
+	int hidraw_fd = -1;
+	int hid_id, attach_fd, err = -EINVAL;
+	struct attach_prog_args args = {
+		.retval = -1,
+	};
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattr,
+			    .ctx_in = &args,
+			    .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+	);
+
+	/* locate the uevent file of the created device */
+	hid_id = get_hid_id(dev_id);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(hid_id, 0, "locate uhid device id"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	args.hid = hid_id;
+
+	hid_skel = hid__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(hid_skel, "hid_skel_open"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(hid_skel->progs.hid_test_insert1, true);
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(hid_skel->progs.hid_test_insert2, true);
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(hid_skel->progs.hid_test_insert3, true);
+
+	err = hid__load(hid_skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_skel_load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	attach_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.attach_prog);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(attach_fd, 0, "locate attach_prog")) {
+		err = attach_fd;
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	/* attach hid_test_insert2 program */
+	args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.hid_test_insert2);
+	args.flags = HID_BPF_FLAG_NONE;
+	args.retval = 1;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, "attach_hid_test_insert2"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* then attach hid_test_insert1 program before the previous*/
+	args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.hid_test_insert1);
+	args.flags = HID_BPF_FLAG_INSERT_HEAD;
+	args.retval = 1;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, "attach_hid_test_insert1"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* finally attach hid_test_insert3 at the end */
+	args.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.hid_test_insert3);
+	args.flags = HID_BPF_FLAG_NONE;
+	args.retval = 1;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(attach_fd, &tattr);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 0, "attach_hid_test_insert3"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	hidraw_fd = open_hidraw(dev_id);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(hidraw_fd, 0, "open_hidraw"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* inject one event */
+	buf[0] = 1;
+	send_event(uhid_fd, buf, 6);
+
+	/* read the data from hidraw */
+	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+	err = read(hidraw_fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 6, "read_hidraw"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(buf[1], 1, "hid_test_insert1"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 2, "hid_test_insert2"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(buf[3], 3, "hid_test_insert3"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	err = 0;
+
+ cleanup:
+	if (hidraw_fd >= 0)
+		close(hidraw_fd);
+
+	hid__destroy(hid_skel);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach hid_rdesc_fixup to the given uhid device,
  * retrieve and open the matching hidraw node,
@@ -866,6 +971,8 @@  void serial_test_hid_bpf(void)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_change_report");
 	err = test_hid_user_raw_request_call(uhid_fd, dev_id);
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_user_raw_request");
+	err = test_hid_attach_flags(uhid_fd, dev_id);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_attach_flags");
 
 	/*
 	 * this test should be run last because we disconnect/reconnect
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
index 815ff94321c9..eb869a80c254 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@  extern int hid_bpf_hw_request(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx,
 struct attach_prog_args {
 	int prog_fd;
 	unsigned int hid;
+	unsigned int flags;
 	int retval;
 };
 
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@  int attach_prog(struct attach_prog_args *ctx)
 {
 	ctx->retval = hid_bpf_attach_prog(ctx->hid,
 					  ctx->prog_fd,
-					  0);
+					  ctx->flags);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -152,3 +153,54 @@  int BPF_PROG(hid_rdesc_fixup, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
 
 	return sizeof(rdesc) + 73;
 }
+
+SEC("?fmod_ret/hid_bpf_device_event")
+int BPF_PROG(hid_test_insert1, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
+{
+	__u8 *data = hid_bpf_get_data(hid_ctx, 0 /* offset */, 4 /* size */);
+
+	if (!data)
+		return 0; /* EPERM check */
+
+	/* we need to be run first */
+	if (data[2] || data[3])
+		return -1;
+
+	data[1] = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fmod_ret/hid_bpf_device_event")
+int BPF_PROG(hid_test_insert2, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
+{
+	__u8 *data = hid_bpf_get_data(hid_ctx, 0 /* offset */, 4 /* size */);
+
+	if (!data)
+		return 0; /* EPERM check */
+
+	/* after insert0 and before insert2 */
+	if (!data[1] || data[3])
+		return -1;
+
+	data[2] = 2;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fmod_ret/hid_bpf_device_event")
+int BPF_PROG(hid_test_insert3, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
+{
+	__u8 *data = hid_bpf_get_data(hid_ctx, 0 /* offset */, 4 /* size */);
+
+	if (!data)
+		return 0; /* EPERM check */
+
+	/* at the end */
+	if (!data[1] || !data[2])
+		return -1;
+
+	data[3] = 3;
+
+	return 0;
+}