diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,3/4] bpf: Use rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() in local storage map

Message ID 20221014113946.965131-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit d39d1445d37747032e2b26732fed6fe25161cd36
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Remove unnecessary RCU grace period chaining | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 2 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 26 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Hou Tao Oct. 14, 2022, 11:39 a.m. UTC 
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Local storage map is accessible for both sleepable and non-sleepable bpf
program, and its memory is freed by using both call_rcu_tasks_trace() and
kfree_rcu() to wait for both RCU-tasks-trace grace period and RCU grace
period to pass.

With the introduction of rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp(), both
bpf_selem_free_rcu() and bpf_local_storage_free_rcu() can check whether
or not a normal RCU grace period has also passed after a RCU-tasks-trace
grace period has passed. If it is true, it is safe to call kfree()
directly.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 802fc15b0d73..9dc6de1cf185 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -88,8 +88,14 @@  void bpf_local_storage_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 {
 	struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
 
+	/* If RCU Tasks Trace grace period implies RCU grace period, do
+	 * kfree(), else do kfree_rcu().
+	 */
 	local_storage = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_local_storage, rcu);
-	kfree_rcu(local_storage, rcu);
+	if (rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp())
+		kfree(local_storage);
+	else
+		kfree_rcu(local_storage, rcu);
 }
 
 static void bpf_selem_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
@@ -97,7 +103,10 @@  static void bpf_selem_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
 
 	selem = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_local_storage_elem, rcu);
-	kfree_rcu(selem, rcu);
+	if (rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp())
+		kfree(selem);
+	else
+		kfree_rcu(selem, rcu);
 }
 
 /* local_storage->lock must be held and selem->local_storage == local_storage.