diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2] bpf/docs: Summarize CI system and deny lists

Message ID 20221018164015.1970862-1-deso@posteo.net (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 81bfcc3fcd2f99578eebc2f64248253b57fc5c76
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v2] bpf/docs: Summarize CI system and deny lists | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: sdf@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com yhs@fb.com haoluo@google.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 54 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 fail Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Daniel Müller Oct. 18, 2022, 4:40 p.m. UTC
This change adds a brief summary of the BPF continuous integration (CI)
to the BPF selftest documentation. The summary focuses not so much on
actual workings of the CI, as it is maintained outside of the
repository, but aims to document the few bits of it that are sourced
from this repository and that developers may want to adjust as part of
patch submissions: the BPF kernel configuration and the deny list
file(s).

Changelog:
- v1->v2:
  - use s390x instead of s390 for consistency

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Oct. 19, 2022, 7:10 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:40:15 +0000 you wrote:
> This change adds a brief summary of the BPF continuous integration (CI)
> to the BPF selftest documentation. The summary focuses not so much on
> actual workings of the CI, as it is maintained outside of the
> repository, but aims to document the few bits of it that are sourced
> from this repository and that developers may want to adjust as part of
> patch submissions: the BPF kernel configuration and the deny list
> file(s).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf/docs: Summarize CI system and deny lists
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/81bfcc3fcd2f

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst
index d3c6b3d..acd50c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst
@@ -6,13 +6,53 @@  General instructions on running selftests can be found in
 
 __ /Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst#q-how-to-run-bpf-selftests
 
+=============
+BPF CI System
+=============
+
+BPF employs a continuous integration (CI) system to check patch submission in an
+automated fashion. The system runs selftests for each patch in a series. Results
+are propagated to patchwork, where failures are highlighted similar to
+violations of other checks (such as additional warnings being emitted or a
+``scripts/checkpatch.pl`` reported deficiency):
+
+  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?delegate=121173
+
+The CI system executes tests on multiple architectures. It uses a kernel
+configuration derived from both the generic and architecture specific config
+file fragments below ``tools/testing/selftests/bpf/`` (e.g., ``config`` and
+``config.x86_64``).
+
+Denylisting Tests
+=================
+
+It is possible for some architectures to not have support for all BPF features.
+In such a case tests in CI may fail. An example of such a shortcoming is BPF
+trampoline support on IBM's s390x architecture. For cases like this, an in-tree
+deny list file, located at ``tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.<arch>``, can
+be used to prevent the test from running on such an architecture.
+
+In addition to that, the generic ``tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST`` is
+honored on every architecture running tests.
+
+These files are organized in three columns. The first column lists the test in
+question. This can be the name of a test suite or of an individual test. The
+remaining two columns provide additional meta data that helps identify and
+classify the entry: column two is a copy and paste of the error being reported
+when running the test in the setting in question. The third column, if
+available, summarizes the underlying problem. A value of ``trampoline``, for
+example, indicates that lack of trampoline support is causing the test to fail.
+This last entry helps identify tests that can be re-enabled once such support is
+added.
+
 =========================
 Running Selftests in a VM
 =========================
 
 It's now possible to run the selftests using ``tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh``.
 The script tries to ensure that the tests are run with the same environment as they
-would be run post-submit in the CI used by the Maintainers.
+would be run post-submit in the CI used by the Maintainers, with the exception
+that deny lists are not automatically honored.
 
 This script downloads a suitable Kconfig and VM userspace image from the system used by
 the CI. It builds the kernel (without overwriting your existing Kconfig), recompiles the