From patchwork Fri Oct 21 11:49:12 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hou Tao X-Patchwork-Id: 13014688 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5594AC43217 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229604AbiJULXb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:23:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37284 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229667AbiJULXa (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:23:30 -0400 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4127E2639FA for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 04:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Mv28c4V4mz6R4t1 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:21:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgD3PS4rgVJjbYvJAA--.39S5; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:23:27 +0800 (CST) From: Hou Tao To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Stanislav Fomichev Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , Andrii Nakryiko , Song Liu , Hao Luo , Yonghong Song , Daniel Borkmann , KP Singh , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , houtao1@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Wait for busy refill_work when destroying bpf memory allocator Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:49:12 +0800 Message-Id: <20221021114913.60508-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20221021114913.60508-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221021114913.60508-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgD3PS4rgVJjbYvJAA--.39S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxWF17Xw1kZr1ruF4fWFWDCFg_yoW5KFy7pF 4Sqr1rGr4kZF42vw1fu3WxCr93AryF93W3G3ykA3s3Zr15Kryjkwn7KFyjqFyagrs7ta42 yFsF9rW0g3s8X3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBYb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8-TmDUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: xkrx3t3r6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Hou Tao A busy irq work is an unfinished irq work and it can be either in the pending state or in the running state. When destroying bpf memory allocator, refill_work may be busy for PREEMPT_RT kernel in which irq work is invoked in a per-CPU RT-kthread. It is also possible for kernel with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() being false (e.g. 1-cpu arm32 host or mips) and irq work is inovked in timer interrupt. The busy refill_work leads to various issues. The obvious one is that there will be concurrent operations on free_by_rcu and free_list between irq work and memory draining. Another one is call_rcu_in_progress will not be reliable for the checking of pending RCU callback because do_call_rcu() may have not been invoked by irq work yet. The other is there will be use-after-free if irq work is freed before the callback of irq work is invoked as shown below: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 12ab94067 P4D 12ab94067 PUD 1796b4067 PMD 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP CPU: 5 PID: 64 Comm: irq_work/5 Not tainted 6.0.0-rt11+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffadc080293e78 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffcdc07fb6a388 RCX: ffffa05000a2e000 RDX: ffffa05000a2e000 RSI: ffffffff96cc9827 RDI: ffffcdc07fb6a388 ...... Call Trace: irq_work_single+0x24/0x60 irq_work_run_list+0x24/0x30 run_irq_workd+0x23/0x30 smpboot_thread_fn+0x203/0x300 kthread+0x126/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Considering the ease of concurrency handling, no overhead for irq_work_sync() under non-PREEMPT_RT kernel and has-irq-work-interrupt kernel and the short wait time used for irq_work_sync() under PREEMPT_RT (When running two test_maps on PREEMPT_RT kernel and 72-cpus host, the max wait time is about 8ms and the 99th percentile is 10us), just using irq_work_sync() to wait for busy refill_work to complete before memory draining and memory freeing. Fixes: 7c8199e24fa0 ("bpf: Introduce any context BPF specific memory allocator.") Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Hou Tao --- kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c index 2433be58bb85..4e4b3250aada 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c @@ -498,6 +498,16 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma) rcu_in_progress = 0; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { c = per_cpu_ptr(ma->cache, cpu); + /* + * refill_work may be unfinished for PREEMPT_RT kernel + * in which irq work is invoked in a per-CPU RT thread. + * It is also possible for kernel with + * arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() being false and irq + * work is invoked in timer interrupt. So waiting for + * the completion of irq work to ease the handling of + * concurrency. + */ + irq_work_sync(&c->refill_work); drain_mem_cache(c); rcu_in_progress += atomic_read(&c->call_rcu_in_progress); } @@ -512,6 +522,7 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma) cc = per_cpu_ptr(ma->caches, cpu); for (i = 0; i < NUM_CACHES; i++) { c = &cc->cache[i]; + irq_work_sync(&c->refill_work); drain_mem_cache(c); rcu_in_progress += atomic_read(&c->call_rcu_in_progress); }