diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix incorrect ASSERT in the tcp_hdr_options test

Message ID 20221107230420.4192307-3-martin.lau@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 52929912d7bda040b43538e8d88e8d231b76eb4e
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add hwtstamp field for the sockops prog | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: sdf@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com haoluo@google.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org yhs@fb.com shuah@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org zhuyifei@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 16 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Martin KaFai Lau Nov. 7, 2022, 11:04 p.m. UTC 
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This patch fixes the incorrect ASSERT test in tcp_hdr_options during
the CHECK to ASSERT macro cleanup.

Cc: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Fixes: 3082f8cd4ba3 ("selftests/bpf: Convert tcp_hdr_options test to ASSERT_* macros")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

wangyufen Nov. 8, 2022, 3:07 a.m. UTC | #1 
在 2022/11/8 7:04, Martin KaFai Lau 写道:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> This patch fixes the incorrect ASSERT test in tcp_hdr_options during
> the CHECK to ASSERT macro cleanup.
>
> Cc: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
> Fixes: 3082f8cd4ba3 ("selftests/bpf: Convert tcp_hdr_options test to ASSERT_* macros")
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
> index 617bbce6ef8f..57191773572a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void misc(void)
>   			goto check_linum;
>   
>   		ret = read(sk_fds.passive_fd, recv_msg, sizeof(recv_msg));
> -		if (ASSERT_EQ(ret, sizeof(send_msg), "read(msg)"))
> +		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, sizeof(send_msg), "read(msg)"))
>   			goto check_linum;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void test_tcp_hdr_options(void)
>   		goto skel_destroy;
>   
>   	cg_fd = test__join_cgroup(CG_NAME);
> -	if (ASSERT_GE(cg_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(cg_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
>   		goto skel_destroy;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {

LGTM. Sorry for the breakage.

Acked-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
index 617bbce6ef8f..57191773572a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@  static void misc(void)
 			goto check_linum;
 
 		ret = read(sk_fds.passive_fd, recv_msg, sizeof(recv_msg));
-		if (ASSERT_EQ(ret, sizeof(send_msg), "read(msg)"))
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, sizeof(send_msg), "read(msg)"))
 			goto check_linum;
 	}
 
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@  void test_tcp_hdr_options(void)
 		goto skel_destroy;
 
 	cg_fd = test__join_cgroup(CG_NAME);
-	if (ASSERT_GE(cg_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(cg_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
 		goto skel_destroy;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {