From patchwork Mon Nov 14 19:15:41 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi X-Patchwork-Id: 13042736 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24DAC4332F for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 19:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236117AbiKNTRL (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:17:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55976 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236656AbiKNTQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:16:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0561927B32 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id f5-20020a17090a4a8500b002131bb59d61so12969086pjh.1 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8UqleD//A6KXCAy0Y6jAtCZ9y5aTXl3qAfr2evlQs5c=; b=ZhChMiIBZ248i4iKb6xQwSu6dl9N/eJiOHlDi88Pb1bHsBNPncGwDVY1X4lOlui95q FJgCCqLkVY8hsVZ6KCOZvfxwyAMhny5GRe6ZIZ2yVgSKki3BI2rm+1wukNpUk2YU3sjw DZu5O/kMpwsCLU3n0/oCJKub3U5m/OHKdySr8siCdhxIY0p3mKYKplODXGppcCYwP7mX wHDf+LlnyaeBtXR7RzGPIIBLkus90WeR7PvULiGpjjXaYA0mnuzgHW2Pd9UpwHC3pFGM YvFnpiL5lr3rQ0LRZJj/TivPutyoLhNVlQBJ0bY/aUdzk4eGhzl4mnIs0llSoYo66SF7 q3uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8UqleD//A6KXCAy0Y6jAtCZ9y5aTXl3qAfr2evlQs5c=; b=BSs9KYO5jkK/RuL/zxzYmuRB2EerBKMb3gmBSobB9Un++tpFXXhJ9CjUnio6El5C37 M0VhYND+5x85AEUE2DKt6i1freZw4sCjHCiuDMJU2CQbRBjlp4st5WHoJB/hHrH+MkJQ tlL9SK1yfosbavu/TFUtCzqt6eCRh2OWm3DI6Jjdt9iMAJxgLTApWG6iwXZeTyZuwV+F gOQiWfn56HKRH/ImvB0gZWnYoFjugG4XTsToSoaQAEKVuJUir5A5XsWG3cIIwNav2fg0 qA51CUb09UJVEhyrnAcqKu2b3h8tiGV6S7csAhwApMWGgu/ka8irJ1XBihZCBgs1yS5n nu3w== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmnA4kbZDfHPRZhAD7ZMnTK3/kqggxZn6UTkUR1g/BhvHlBRmDa F1qBLQFel6OJignFXCwXR+TLnfIMzfpwKQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5nA88FaUKVskKXo5U2RSHEbOtJERWsvwwlXaV+NI/jsnp9Lv4sKp6OYTs+ZvH7TBbOSa7esw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4ec8:b0:20d:63be:917b with SMTP id v8-20020a17090a4ec800b0020d63be917bmr15243220pjl.80.1668453412225; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([59.152.80.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10-20020a170902ea0a00b00177faf558b5sm7895849plg.250.2022.11.14.11.16.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:51 -0800 (PST) From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Dave Marchevsky Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 20/26] bpf: Introduce single ownership BPF linked list API Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:45:41 +0530 Message-Id: <20221114191547.1694267-21-memxor@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221114191547.1694267-1-memxor@gmail.com> References: <20221114191547.1694267-1-memxor@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=20838; i=memxor@gmail.com; h=from:subject; bh=9pD5UQ4ILuM8SrVIrfLdY/cgruSQvKt+hNH5IofHh/g=; b=owEBbQKS/ZANAwAIAUzgyIZIvxHKAcsmYgBjcpPJzXrRsJ8qcIPFmcD4xmI8leU27A4YB5uzicS/ 7hC+MJmJAjMEAAEIAB0WIQRLvip+Buz51YI8YRFM4MiGSL8RygUCY3KTyQAKCRBM4MiGSL8Ryu11D/ wOavHFwoHHfSh1pcO7RTwQ0W97MemJkIGPcutLmMBlFkVeeXBCKAG+thJKoZIPgWbYph76aVyWx8HI nJsJPqUVXezIjMX0vXXxXwfEcIVd5+k+NfEHKB4OTdUx/EOSe0z5E5yoR4tvcvqKQT51Fscq5CElr6 4eHhdQuiBBcSpDCA9YcJy8uI+py9kv6iirzQvEq5KFoDPptKsMwyASQsFhrCZJfqQt4nOSCKCLdOxQ QPpjWwGU/r0bN9wRwjVB+xlNJJ4wwthI6cbQZB6cNRoCawXbTHOxHXkyMwQOTR5+wOr4cN5NffzT0g fzUdR4/k9RrY8M+74ZfNkOphYUr/3Venx2IKHTiFYtTMb9sKc2AZTZybkHHJ82nB0PWGuWf8m4WInV n5OCsJiRLxdiDhN6XEu6ScdO4HKQBAqkLlYLI3WUHwLXfufMBZsYeRAXcZJdHB1ApSaWoVKKaex7Qt vOYY9SVz7mnlKcte7UXRimOjMI7QpJWaoj1kmPEiMCuDByBghOXVbpsJGMNX7qDkBFvrVXzUpfNFpD X+7S60S+5/LtbWQiQWXnPdMcTG+yPUC0/kXOahjvOp36Gt9E07MqmI1xU4EUz95va/C8pLuZ48dnUK O+b9edZ39PWvlAt374loKP/qIAai4rTqlUriRw73cEi8yCd9C54SWguGxQ8A== X-Developer-Key: i=memxor@gmail.com; a=openpgp; fpr=4BBE2A7E06ECF9D5823C61114CE0C88648BF11CA Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Add a linked list API for use in BPF programs, where it expects protection from the bpf_spin_lock in the same allocation as the bpf_list_head. For now, only one bpf_spin_lock can be present hence that is assumed to be the one protecting the bpf_list_head. The following functions are added to kick things off: // Add node to beginning of list void bpf_list_push_front(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node); // Add node to end of list void bpf_list_push_back(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node); // Remove node at beginning of list and return it struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head); // Remove node at end of list and return it struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head); The lock protecting the bpf_list_head needs to be taken for all operations. The verifier ensures that the lock that needs to be taken is always held, and only the correct lock is taken for these operations. These checks are made statically by relying on the reg->id preserved for registers pointing into regions having both bpf_spin_lock and the objects protected by it. The comment over check_reg_allocation_locked in this change describes the logic in detail. Note that bpf_list_push_front and bpf_list_push_back are meant to consume the object containing the node in the 1st argument, however that specific mechanism is intended to not release the ref_obj_id directly until the bpf_spin_unlock is called. In this commit, nothing is done, but the next commit will be introducing logic to handle this case, so it has been left as is for now. bpf_list_pop_front and bpf_list_pop_back delete the first or last item of the list respectively, and return pointer to the element at the list_node offset. The user can then use container_of style macro to get the actual entry type. The verifier however statically knows the actual type, so the safety properties are still preserved. With these additions, programs can now manage their own linked lists and store their objects in them. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi --- kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 55 +++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 292 +++++++++++++++++- .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 28 ++ 3 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index 71d803ca0c1d..212e791d7452 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -1780,6 +1780,50 @@ void bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign) bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, p); } +static void __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node *node, struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail) +{ + struct list_head *n = (void *)node, *h = (void *)head; + + if (unlikely(!h->next)) + INIT_LIST_HEAD(h); + if (unlikely(!n->next)) + INIT_LIST_HEAD(n); + tail ? list_add_tail(n, h) : list_add(n, h); +} + +void bpf_list_push_front(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node) +{ + return __bpf_list_add(node, head, false); +} + +void bpf_list_push_back(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node) +{ + return __bpf_list_add(node, head, true); +} + +static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail) +{ + struct list_head *n, *h = (void *)head; + + if (unlikely(!h->next)) + INIT_LIST_HEAD(h); + if (list_empty(h)) + return NULL; + n = tail ? h->prev : h->next; + list_del_init(n); + return (struct bpf_list_node *)n; +} + +struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head) +{ + return __bpf_list_del(head, false); +} + +struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head) +{ + return __bpf_list_del(head, true); +} + __diag_pop(); BTF_SET8_START(generic_btf_ids) @@ -1788,6 +1832,10 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, crash_kexec, KF_DESTRUCTIVE) #endif BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_obj_new_impl, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_obj_drop_impl, KF_RELEASE) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_front) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_front, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_back, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_SET8_END(generic_btf_ids) static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set generic_kfunc_set = { @@ -1797,7 +1845,12 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set generic_kfunc_set = { static int __init kfunc_init(void) { - return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &generic_kfunc_set); + int ret; + + ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &generic_kfunc_set); + if (ret) + return ret; + return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &generic_kfunc_set); } late_initcall(kfunc_init); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index e194c3feb01f..c034ca2d9479 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -7879,6 +7879,9 @@ struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta { struct btf *btf; u32 btf_id; } arg_obj_drop; + struct { + struct btf_field *field; + } arg_list_head; }; static bool is_kfunc_acquire(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) @@ -7989,13 +7992,17 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_ret_buf_size(const struct btf *btf, enum { KF_ARG_DYNPTR_ID, + KF_ARG_LIST_HEAD_ID, + KF_ARG_LIST_NODE_ID, }; BTF_ID_LIST(kf_arg_btf_ids) BTF_ID(struct, bpf_dynptr_kern) +BTF_ID(struct, bpf_list_head) +BTF_ID(struct, bpf_list_node) -static bool is_kfunc_arg_dynptr(const struct btf *btf, - const struct btf_param *arg) +static bool __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(const struct btf *btf, + const struct btf_param *arg, int type) { const struct btf_type *t; u32 res_id; @@ -8008,7 +8015,22 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_dynptr(const struct btf *btf, t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, &res_id); if (!t) return false; - return btf_types_are_same(btf, res_id, btf_vmlinux, kf_arg_btf_ids[KF_ARG_DYNPTR_ID]); + return btf_types_are_same(btf, res_id, btf_vmlinux, kf_arg_btf_ids[type]); +} + +static bool is_kfunc_arg_dynptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg) +{ + return __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_DYNPTR_ID); +} + +static bool is_kfunc_arg_list_head(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg) +{ + return __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_LIST_HEAD_ID); +} + +static bool is_kfunc_arg_list_node(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg) +{ + return __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_LIST_NODE_ID); } /* Returns true if struct is composed of scalars, 4 levels of nesting allowed */ @@ -8065,6 +8087,8 @@ enum kfunc_ptr_arg_type { KF_ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_BTF_ID, /* Allocated object */ KF_ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR_STRONG, /* PTR_TO_KPTR but type specific */ KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, + KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD, + KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_NODE, KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, /* Also covers reg2btf_ids conversions */ KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_SIZE, /* Size derived from next argument, skip it */ @@ -8073,16 +8097,28 @@ enum kfunc_ptr_arg_type { enum special_kfunc_type { KF_bpf_obj_new_impl, KF_bpf_obj_drop_impl, + KF_bpf_list_push_front, + KF_bpf_list_push_back, + KF_bpf_list_pop_front, + KF_bpf_list_pop_back, }; BTF_SET_START(special_kfunc_set) BTF_ID(func, bpf_obj_new_impl) BTF_ID(func, bpf_obj_drop_impl) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_front) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_back) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_front) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_back) BTF_SET_END(special_kfunc_set) BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list) BTF_ID(func, bpf_obj_new_impl) BTF_ID(func, bpf_obj_drop_impl) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_front) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_back) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_front) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_back) static enum kfunc_ptr_arg_type get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, @@ -8125,6 +8161,12 @@ get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (is_kfunc_arg_dynptr(meta->btf, &args[argno])) return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR; + if (is_kfunc_arg_list_head(meta->btf, &args[argno])) + return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD; + + if (is_kfunc_arg_list_node(meta->btf, &args[argno])) + return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_NODE; + if ((base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID || reg2btf_ids[base_type(reg->type)])) { if (!btf_type_is_struct(ref_t)) { verbose(env, "kernel function %s args#%d pointer type %s %s is not supported\n", @@ -8220,6 +8262,194 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_kptr_strong(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return 0; } +/* Implementation details: + * + * Each register points to some region of memory, which we define as an + * allocation. Each allocation may embed a bpf_spin_lock which protects any + * special BPF objects (bpf_list_head, bpf_rb_root, etc.) part of the same + * allocation. The lock and the data it protects are colocated in the same + * memory region. + * + * Hence, everytime a register holds a pointer value pointing to such + * allocation, the verifier preserves a unique reg->id for it. + * + * The verifier remembers the lock 'ptr' and the lock 'id' whenever + * bpf_spin_lock is called. + * + * To enable this, lock state in the verifier captures two values: + * active_lock.ptr = Register's type specific pointer + * active_lock.id = A unique ID for each register pointer value + * + * Currently, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE and PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC are the two + * supported register types. + * + * The active_lock.ptr in case of map values is the reg->map_ptr, and in case of + * allocated objects is the reg->btf pointer. + * + * The active_lock.id is non-unique for maps supporting direct_value_addr, as we + * can establish the provenance of the map value statically for each distinct + * lookup into such maps. They always contain a single map value hence unique + * IDs for each pseudo load pessimizes the algorithm and rejects valid programs. + * + * So, in case of global variables, they use array maps with max_entries = 1, + * hence their active_lock.ptr becomes map_ptr and id = 0 (since they all point + * into the same map value as max_entries is 1, as described above). + * + * In case of inner map lookups, the inner map pointer has same map_ptr as the + * outer map pointer (in verifier context), but each lookup into an inner map + * assigns a fresh reg->id to the lookup, so while lookups into distinct inner + * maps from the same outer map share the same map_ptr as active_lock.ptr, they + * will get different reg->id assigned to each lookup, hence different + * active_lock.id. + * + * In case of allocated objects, active_lock.ptr is the reg->btf, and the + * reg->id is a unique ID preserved after the NULL pointer check on the pointer + * returned from bpf_obj_new. Each allocation receives a new reg->id. + */ +static int check_reg_allocation_locked(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + void *ptr; + u32 id; + + switch ((int)reg->type) { + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + ptr = reg->map_ptr; + break; + case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC: + ptr = reg->btf; + break; + default: + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unknown reg type for lock check\n"); + return -EFAULT; + } + id = reg->id; + + if (!env->cur_state->active_lock.ptr) + return -EINVAL; + if (env->cur_state->active_lock.ptr != ptr || + env->cur_state->active_lock.id != id) { + verbose(env, "held lock and object are not in the same allocation\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + return 0; +} + +static bool is_bpf_list_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id) +{ + return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front] || + btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back] || + btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_front] || + btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_back]; +} + +static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_head(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 regno, + struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) +{ + struct btf_record *rec = NULL; + struct btf_field *field; + u32 list_head_off; + + if (meta->btf != btf_vmlinux || !is_bpf_list_api_kfunc(meta->func_id)) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: bpf_list_head argument for unknown kfunc\n"); + return -EFAULT; + } + + if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) { + rec = reg->map_ptr->record; + } else /* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC */ { + struct btf_struct_meta *meta; + + meta = btf_find_struct_meta(reg->btf, reg->btf_id); + if (!meta) { + verbose(env, "bpf_list_head not found for allocated object\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + rec = meta->record; + } + + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + verbose(env, + "R%d doesn't have constant offset. bpf_list_head has to be at the constant offset\n", + regno); + return -EINVAL; + } + + list_head_off = reg->off + reg->var_off.value; + field = btf_record_find(rec, list_head_off, BPF_LIST_HEAD); + if (!field) { + verbose(env, "bpf_list_head not found at offset=%u\n", list_head_off); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* All functions require bpf_list_head to be protected using a bpf_spin_lock */ + if (check_reg_allocation_locked(env, reg)) { + verbose(env, "bpf_spin_lock at off=%d must be held for bpf_list_head\n", + rec->spin_lock_off); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (meta->arg_list_head.field) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: repeating bpf_list_head arg\n"); + return -EFAULT; + } + meta->arg_list_head.field = field; + return 0; +} + +static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_node(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 regno, + struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) +{ + struct btf_struct_meta *struct_meta; + struct btf_field *field; + struct btf_record *rec; + u32 list_node_off; + + if (meta->btf != btf_vmlinux || + (meta->func_id != special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front] && + meta->func_id != special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back])) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: bpf_list_head argument for unknown kfunc\n"); + return -EFAULT; + } + + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + verbose(env, + "R%d doesn't have constant offset. bpf_list_head has to be at the constant offset\n", + regno); + return -EINVAL; + } + + struct_meta = btf_find_struct_meta(reg->btf, reg->btf_id); + if (!struct_meta) { + verbose(env, "bpf_list_node not found for allocated object\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + rec = struct_meta->record; + + list_node_off = reg->off + reg->var_off.value; + field = btf_record_find(rec, list_node_off, BPF_LIST_NODE); + if (!field || field->offset != list_node_off) { + verbose(env, "bpf_list_node not found at offset=%u\n", list_node_off); + return -EINVAL; + } + + field = meta->arg_list_head.field; + + if (!btf_struct_ids_match(&env->log, reg->btf, reg->btf_id, 0, field->list_head.btf, + field->list_head.value_btf_id, true)) { + verbose(env, "bpf_list_head value type does not match arg#1\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (list_node_off != field->list_head.node_offset) { + verbose(env, "arg#1 offset must be for bpf_list_node at off=%d\n", + field->list_head.node_offset); + return -EINVAL; + } + return 0; +} + static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) { const char *func_name = meta->func_name, *ref_tname; @@ -8340,6 +8570,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ break; case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR_STRONG: case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR: + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD: + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_NODE: case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MEM: case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_SIZE: /* Trusted by default */ @@ -8404,6 +8636,33 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ return -EINVAL; } break; + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD: + if (reg->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE && + reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC)) { + verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to map value or allocated object\n", i); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (reg->type == (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC) && !reg->ref_obj_id) { + verbose(env, "allocated object must be referenced\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + ret = process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_head(env, reg, regno, meta); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + break; + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_NODE: + if (reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC)) { + verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to allocated object\n", i); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (!reg->ref_obj_id) { + verbose(env, "allocated object must be referenced\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + ret = process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_node(env, reg, regno, meta); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + break; case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID: /* Only base_type is checked, further checks are done here */ if (reg->type != PTR_TO_BTF_ID && @@ -8535,11 +8794,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, ptr_type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(desc_btf, t->type, &ptr_type_id); if (meta.btf == btf_vmlinux && btf_id_set_contains(&special_kfunc_set, meta.func_id)) { - if (!btf_type_is_void(ptr_type)) { - verbose(env, "kernel function %s must have void * return type\n", - meta.func_name); - return -EINVAL; - } if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_obj_new_impl]) { const struct btf_type *ret_t; struct btf *ret_btf; @@ -8577,6 +8831,15 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].kptr_struct_meta = btf_find_struct_meta(meta.arg_obj_drop.btf, meta.arg_obj_drop.btf_id); + } else if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_front] || + meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_back]) { + struct btf_field *field = meta.arg_list_head.field; + + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0); + regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC; + regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = field->list_head.btf; + regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = field->list_head.value_btf_id; + regs[BPF_REG_0].off = field->list_head.node_offset; } else { verbose(env, "kernel function %s unhandled dynamic return type\n", meta.func_name); @@ -13244,11 +13507,14 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } - if (env->cur_state->active_lock.ptr && - (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL || - insn->imm != BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock)) { - verbose(env, "function calls are not allowed while holding a lock\n"); - return -EINVAL; + if (env->cur_state->active_lock.ptr) { + if ((insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_0 && insn->imm != BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock) || + (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) || + (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL && + (insn->off != 0 || !is_bpf_list_api_kfunc(insn->imm)))) { + verbose(env, "function calls are not allowed while holding a lock\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } } if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) err = check_func_call(env, insn, &env->insn_idx); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h index 8473395a11af..d6b143275e82 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h @@ -35,4 +35,32 @@ extern void bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *kptr, void *meta) __ksym; /* Convenience macro to wrap over bpf_obj_drop_impl */ #define bpf_obj_drop(kptr) bpf_obj_drop_impl(kptr, NULL) +/* Description + * Add a new entry to the beginning of the BPF linked list. + * Returns + * Void. + */ +extern void bpf_list_push_front(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node) __ksym; + +/* Description + * Add a new entry to the end of the BPF linked list. + * Returns + * Void. + */ +extern void bpf_list_push_back(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node) __ksym; + +/* Description + * Remove the entry at the beginning of the BPF linked list. + * Returns + * Pointer to bpf_list_node of deleted entry, or NULL if list is empty. + */ +extern struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head) __ksym; + +/* Description + * Remove the entry at the end of the BPF linked list. + * Returns + * Pointer to bpf_list_node of deleted entry, or NULL if list is empty. + */ +extern struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head) __ksym; + #endif