diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v6,3/7] bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()

Message ID 20221117042833.1090028-1-yhs@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add bpf_rcu_read_lock() support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 1362 this patch: 1364
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: sdf@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com jolsa@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev song@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 157 this patch: 157
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 1352 this patch: 1354
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Yonghong Song Nov. 17, 2022, 4:28 a.m. UTC
Add two kfunc's bpf_rcu_read_lock() and bpf_rcu_read_unlock(). These two kfunc's
can be used for all program types. A new kfunc hook type BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_GENERIC
is added which corresponds to prog type BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, indicating the
kfunc intends to be used for all prog types.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  |  3 +++
 kernel/bpf/btf.c     |  8 ++++++++
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 54462dd28824..8c89d6020fb3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2126,6 +2126,9 @@  bool bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(const struct bpf_prog *prog);
 const struct btf_func_model *
 bpf_jit_find_kfunc_model(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			 const struct bpf_insn *insn);
+void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void);
+void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void);
+
 struct bpf_core_ctx {
 	struct bpf_verifier_log *log;
 	const struct btf *btf;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 875355ff3718..fc4df69cfbf9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@  DEFINE_IDR(btf_idr);
 DEFINE_SPINLOCK(btf_idr_lock);
 
 enum btf_kfunc_hook {
+	BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_GENERIC,
 	BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_XDP,
 	BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_TC,
 	BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_STRUCT_OPS,
@@ -7641,6 +7642,8 @@  static u32 *__btf_kfunc_id_set_contains(const struct btf *btf,
 static int bpf_prog_type_to_kfunc_hook(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
 {
 	switch (prog_type) {
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC:
+		return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_GENERIC;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP:
 		return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_XDP;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
@@ -7669,6 +7672,11 @@  u32 *btf_kfunc_id_set_contains(const struct btf *btf,
 			       u32 kfunc_btf_id)
 {
 	enum btf_kfunc_hook hook;
+	u32 *kfunc_flags;
+
+	kfunc_flags = __btf_kfunc_id_set_contains(btf, BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_GENERIC, kfunc_btf_id);
+	if (kfunc_flags)
+		return kfunc_flags;
 
 	hook = bpf_prog_type_to_kfunc_hook(prog_type);
 	return __btf_kfunc_id_set_contains(btf, hook, kfunc_btf_id);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 7bc71995f17c..292004811af6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1749,9 +1749,32 @@  static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set tracing_kfunc_set = {
 	.set   = &tracing_btf_ids,
 };
 
+void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void)
+{
+	rcu_read_lock();
+}
+
+void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void)
+{
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+BTF_SET8_START(generic_btf_ids)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rcu_read_lock)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rcu_read_unlock)
+BTF_SET8_END(generic_btf_ids)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set generic_kfunc_set = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set   = &generic_btf_ids,
+};
+
 static int __init kfunc_init(void)
 {
-	return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &tracing_kfunc_set);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &tracing_kfunc_set);
+	return ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, &generic_kfunc_set);
 }
 
 late_initcall(kfunc_init);