diff mbox series

[net-next,RFC,7/7] devlink: assert if devl_port_register/unregister() is called on unregistered devlink instance

Message ID 20221201164608.209537-8-jiri@resnulli.us (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 6 of 6 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: 'withing' may be misspelled - perhaps 'within'?
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Jiri Pirko Dec. 1, 2022, 4:46 p.m. UTC
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>

Now when all drivers do call devl_port_register/unregister() withing the
time frame during which the devlink is registered, put and assertion to
the functions to check that and avoid going back.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
---
 net/core/devlink.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Leon Romanovsky Dec. 4, 2022, 11:40 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> 
> Now when all drivers do call devl_port_register/unregister() withing the
> time frame during which the devlink is registered, put and assertion to
> the functions to check that and avoid going back.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  net/core/devlink.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

You also need to remove delayed notifications from devlink_notify_register()

   9862         xa_for_each(&devlink->ports, port_index, devlink_port)
   9863                 devlink_port_notify(devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW);

Thanks
Jiri Pirko Dec. 5, 2022, 9:59 a.m. UTC | #2
Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:40:09PM CET, leon@kernel.org wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> 
>> Now when all drivers do call devl_port_register/unregister() withing the
>> time frame during which the devlink is registered, put and assertion to
>> the functions to check that and avoid going back.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  net/core/devlink.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>You also need to remove delayed notifications from devlink_notify_register()
>
>   9862         xa_for_each(&devlink->ports, port_index, devlink_port)
>   9863                 devlink_port_notify(devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW);
>

Correct, I forgot.

>Thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index fca3ebee97b0..c46dd7753368 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -10088,6 +10088,7 @@  int devl_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
 		       struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
 		       unsigned int port_index)
 {
+	ASSERT_DEVLINK_REGISTERED(devlink);
 	devl_assert_locked(devlink);
 
 	if (devlink_port_index_exists(devlink, port_index))
@@ -10145,6 +10146,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_register);
  */
 void devl_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
 {
+	ASSERT_DEVLINK_REGISTERED(devlink_port->devlink);
 	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink_port->devlink->lock);
 	WARN_ON(devlink_port->type != DEVLINK_PORT_TYPE_NOTSET);