diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: add a test for iter/task_vma for short-lived processes

Message ID 20221216221855.4122288-3-kuifeng@meta.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b7793c8db7d9beb903bb42f52872b5b46abdcb88
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: fix the crash caused by task iterators over vma | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 12 maintainers not CCed: 9erthalion6@gmail.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org houtao1@huawei.com kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com daniel@iogearbox.net martin.lau@linux.dev sdf@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ${{ matrix.test }} on ${{ matrix.arch }} with ${{ matrix.toolchain }}
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 fail Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Kui-Feng Lee Dec. 16, 2022, 10:18 p.m. UTC
When a task iterator traverses vma(s), it is possible task->mm might
become invalid in the middle of traversal and this may cause kernel
misbehave (e.g., crash)

This test case creates iterators repeatedly and forks short-lived
processes in the background to detect this bug.  The test will last
for 3 seconds to get the chance to trigger the issue.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index 6f8ed61fc4b4..3af6450763e9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -1465,6 +1465,77 @@  static void test_task_vma_common(struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts)
 	bpf_iter_task_vma__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static void test_task_vma_dead_task(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_task_vma *skel;
+	int wstatus, child_pid = -1;
+	time_t start_tm, cur_tm;
+	int err, iter_fd = -1;
+	int wait_sec = 3;
+
+	skel = bpf_iter_task_vma__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_task_vma__open"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	err = bpf_iter_task_vma__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_iter_task_vma__load"))
+		goto out;
+
+	skel->links.proc_maps = bpf_program__attach_iter(
+		skel->progs.proc_maps, NULL);
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.proc_maps, "bpf_program__attach_iter")) {
+		skel->links.proc_maps = NULL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	start_tm = time(NULL);
+	cur_tm = start_tm;
+
+	child_pid = fork();
+	if (child_pid == 0) {
+		/* Fork short-lived processes in the background. */
+		while (cur_tm < start_tm + wait_sec) {
+			system("echo > /dev/null");
+			cur_tm = time(NULL);
+		}
+		exit(0);
+	}
+
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(child_pid, 0, "fork_child"))
+		goto out;
+
+	while (cur_tm < start_tm + wait_sec) {
+		iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(skel->links.proc_maps));
+		if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
+			goto out;
+
+		/* Drain all data from iter_fd. */
+		while (cur_tm < start_tm + wait_sec) {
+			err = read_fd_into_buffer(iter_fd, task_vma_output, CMP_BUFFER_SIZE);
+			if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "read_iter_fd"))
+				goto out;
+
+			cur_tm = time(NULL);
+
+			if (err == 0)
+				break;
+		}
+
+		close(iter_fd);
+		iter_fd = -1;
+	}
+
+	check_bpf_link_info(skel->progs.proc_maps);
+
+out:
+	waitpid(child_pid, &wstatus, 0);
+	close(iter_fd);
+	bpf_iter_task_vma__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 void test_bpf_sockmap_map_iter_fd(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_iter_sockmap *skel;
@@ -1586,6 +1657,8 @@  void test_bpf_iter(void)
 		test_task_file();
 	if (test__start_subtest("task_vma"))
 		test_task_vma();
+	if (test__start_subtest("task_vma_dead_task"))
+		test_task_vma_dead_task();
 	if (test__start_subtest("task_btf"))
 		test_task_btf();
 	if (test__start_subtest("tcp4"))