diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,6/6] libbpf: fix invalid return address register in s390

Message ID 20221224071527.2292-7-danieltimlee@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 7244eb669397f309c3d014264823cdc9cb3f8e6b
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series samples/bpf: enhance syscall tracing program | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 2 blamed authors not CCed: iii@linux.ibm.com andrii@kernel.org; 2 maintainers not CCed: iii@linux.ibm.com andrii@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Daniel T. Lee Dec. 24, 2022, 7:15 a.m. UTC
There is currently an invalid register mapping in the s390 return
address register. As the manual[1] states, the return address can be
found at r14. In bpf_tracing.h, the s390 registers were named
gprs(general purpose registers). This commit fixes the problem by
correcting the mistyped mapping.

[1]: https://uclibc.org/docs/psABI-s390x.pdf#page=14

Fixes: 3cc31d794097 ("libbpf: Normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions")
Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Dec. 29, 2022, 10:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:15 PM Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There is currently an invalid register mapping in the s390 return
> address register. As the manual[1] states, the return address can be
> found at r14. In bpf_tracing.h, the s390 registers were named
> gprs(general purpose registers). This commit fixes the problem by
> correcting the mistyped mapping.
>
> [1]: https://uclibc.org/docs/psABI-s390x.pdf#page=14
>
> Fixes: 3cc31d794097 ("libbpf: Normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> index 2972dc25ff72..9c1b1689068d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct pt_regs___s390 {
>  #define __PT_PARM3_REG gprs[4]
>  #define __PT_PARM4_REG gprs[5]
>  #define __PT_PARM5_REG gprs[6]
> -#define __PT_RET_REG grps[14]
> +#define __PT_RET_REG gprs[14]

oh, wow, what a typo. Thanks for fixing this! Applied patch set to bpf-next.

>  #define __PT_FP_REG gprs[11]   /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
>  #define __PT_RC_REG gprs[2]
>  #define __PT_SP_REG gprs[15]
> --
> 2.34.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
index 2972dc25ff72..9c1b1689068d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@  struct pt_regs___s390 {
 #define __PT_PARM3_REG gprs[4]
 #define __PT_PARM4_REG gprs[5]
 #define __PT_PARM5_REG gprs[6]
-#define __PT_RET_REG grps[14]
+#define __PT_RET_REG gprs[14]
 #define __PT_FP_REG gprs[11]	/* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
 #define __PT_RC_REG gprs[2]
 #define __PT_SP_REG gprs[15]