From patchwork Fri Dec 30 04:11:47 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hou Tao X-Patchwork-Id: 13084058 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE3CC46467 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 04:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234204AbiL3EMS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 23:12:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37678 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234158AbiL3EMJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 23:12:09 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59880186E2; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 20:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NjsKC4w7sz4f3lXL; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:11:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAHcLMPZa5j3H4SAw--.35465S6; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:12:02 +0800 (CST) From: Hou Tao To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , Andrii Nakryiko , Song Liu , Hao Luo , Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , "Paul E . McKenney" , rcu@vger.kernel.org, houtao1@huawei.com Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Factor out a common helper free_llist() Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:11:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20221230041151.1231169-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20221230041151.1231169-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221230041151.1231169-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAHcLMPZa5j3H4SAw--.35465S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxZr43AF4ruF48Xry5Jw1xGrg_yoW5Ww48pF y3Gry8Jr4kAFsrua1xtrn7Cas8Xw1Fqa47K3yUu34Skr13Zwn7tFWIkryIgFy5urW8t3y3 Ar4vgr1xGay8JFDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB0b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUXw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUFa9-UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: xkrx3t3r6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net X-Patchwork-State: RFC From: Hou Tao Factor out a common helper free_llist() to free normal elements or per-cpu elements on a lock-less list. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao --- kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c index ac5b92fece14..3ad2e25946b5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static void alloc_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cnt, int node) mem_cgroup_put(memcg); } -static void free_one(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) +static void free_one(void *obj, bool percpu) { - if (c->percpu_size) { + if (percpu) { free_percpu(((void **)obj)[1]); kfree(obj); return; @@ -228,14 +228,19 @@ static void free_one(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) kfree(obj); } -static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +static void free_llist(struct llist_node *llnode, bool percpu) { - struct bpf_mem_cache *c = container_of(head, struct bpf_mem_cache, rcu); - struct llist_node *llnode = llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp); struct llist_node *pos, *t; llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode) - free_one(c, pos); + free_one(pos, percpu); +} + +static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct bpf_mem_cache *c = container_of(head, struct bpf_mem_cache, rcu); + + free_llist(llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp), !!c->percpu_size); atomic_set(&c->call_rcu_in_progress, 0); } @@ -441,7 +446,7 @@ int bpf_mem_alloc_init(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, int size, bool percpu, static void drain_mem_cache(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) { - struct llist_node *llnode, *t; + bool percpu = !!c->percpu_size; /* No progs are using this bpf_mem_cache, but htab_map_free() called * bpf_mem_cache_free() for all remaining elements and they can be in @@ -450,14 +455,10 @@ static void drain_mem_cache(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) * Except for waiting_for_gp list, there are no concurrent operations * on these lists, so it is safe to use __llist_del_all(). */ - llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu)) - free_one(c, llnode); - llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp)) - free_one(c, llnode); - llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_llist)) - free_one(c, llnode); - llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_llist_extra)) - free_one(c, llnode); + free_llist(__llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu), percpu); + free_llist(llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp), percpu); + free_llist(__llist_del_all(&c->free_llist), percpu); + free_llist(__llist_del_all(&c->free_llist_extra), percpu); } static void free_mem_alloc_no_barrier(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)