diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,4/4] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for static kfunc with unused arg

Message ID 20230201173016.342758-5-void@manifault.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 6aed15e330bfec6a423f40582b2a8b53d9ce1757
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc tag for kfunc definitions | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 36 this patch: 36
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 13 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com pabeni@redhat.com shuah@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org netdev@vger.kernel.org edumazet@google.com mykolal@fb.com yhs@fb.com hawk@kernel.org iii@linux.ibm.com delyank@fb.com davem@davemloft.net
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 36 this patch: 36
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{' WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-17

Commit Message

David Vernet Feb. 1, 2023, 5:30 p.m. UTC
kfuncs are allowed to be static, or not use one or more of their
arguments. For example, bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash() in net/core/xdp.c is
meant to be implemented by drivers, with the default implementation just
returning -EOPNOTSUPP. As described in [0], such kfuncs can have their
arguments elided, which can cause BTF encoding to be skipped. The new
__bpf_kfunc macro should address this, and this patch adds a selftest
which verifies that a static kfunc with at least one unused argument can
still be encoded and invoked by a BPF program.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                                  |  6 ++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c |  1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 11 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index af9827c4b351..e6f773d12045 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -741,6 +741,11 @@  __bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive(void)
 {
 }
 
+__bpf_kfunc static u32 bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(u32 arg, u32 unused)
+{
+	return arg;
+}
+
 __diag_pop();
 
 BTF_SET8_START(bpf_test_modify_return_ids)
@@ -779,6 +784,7 @@  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg)
 BTF_SET8_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
 
 static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index bb4cd82a788a..a543742cd7bd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@  static struct kfunc_test_params kfunc_tests[] = {
 	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_get_mem, 42),
 	SYSCALL_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test, 0),
 	SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test_null, 0),
+	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg, 0),
 };
 
 struct syscall_test_args {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
index d91c58d06d38..7daa8f5720b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@  extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(void *mem, int len) __ksym;
 extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(__u64 *mem, int len) __ksym;
 extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdwr_buf_size) __ksym;
 extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdonly_buf_size) __ksym;
+extern u32 bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(u32 arg, u32 unused) __ksym;
 
 SEC("tc")
 int kfunc_call_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb)
@@ -181,4 +182,14 @@  int kfunc_call_test_get_mem(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+
+	u32 expected = 5, actual;
+
+	actual = bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(expected, 0xdeadbeef);
+	return actual != expected ? -1 : 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";