| Message ID | 20230210064243.116335-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | module: Remove the unused function within | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
Jiapeng Chong writes: >The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called >elsewhere, so remove this unused function. Huh? It's used by __module_text_address(), no? >kernel/module/main.c:3007:19: warning: unused function 'within'. > >Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> >Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 >Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> >--- > kernel/module/main.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c >index c598f11e7016..062065568b40 100644 >--- a/kernel/module/main.c >+++ b/kernel/module/main.c >@@ -3004,11 +3004,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags) > return load_module(&info, uargs, flags); > } > >-static inline int within(unsigned long addr, void *start, unsigned long size) >-{ >- return ((void *)addr >= start && (void *)addr < start + size); >-} >- > /* Keep in sync with MODULE_FLAGS_BUF_SIZE !!! */ > char *module_flags(struct module *mod, char *buf, bool show_state) > { >-- >2.20.1.7.g153144c >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:47:44PM +0000, Chris Down wrote: > Jiapeng Chong writes: > > The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called > > elsewhere, so remove this unused function. > > Huh? It's used by __module_text_address(), no? Not after commit 2ece476a2346 ("module: replace module_layout with module_memory") in -next. This patch should have a fixes tag, even if the warning is currently hidden behind W=1. > > kernel/module/main.c:3007:19: warning: unused function 'within'. > > > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > > Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 > > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> > > --- > > kernel/module/main.c | 5 ----- > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c > > index c598f11e7016..062065568b40 100644 > > --- a/kernel/module/main.c > > +++ b/kernel/module/main.c > > @@ -3004,11 +3004,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags) > > return load_module(&info, uargs, flags); > > } > > > > -static inline int within(unsigned long addr, void *start, unsigned long size) > > -{ > > - return ((void *)addr >= start && (void *)addr < start + size); > > -} > > - > > /* Keep in sync with MODULE_FLAGS_BUF_SIZE !!! */ > > char *module_flags(struct module *mod, char *buf, bool show_state) > > { > > -- > > 2.20.1.7.g153144c > >
+Cc: Song Nathan Chancellor writes: >On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:47:44PM +0000, Chris Down wrote: >> Jiapeng Chong writes: >> > The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called >> > elsewhere, so remove this unused function. >> >> Huh? It's used by __module_text_address(), no? > >Not after commit 2ece476a2346 ("module: replace module_layout with >module_memory") in -next. This patch should have a fixes tag, even if >the warning is currently hidden behind W=1. Huh, I thought I had checked out latest -next, but must have not done so somehow :-) Mea culpa. If it's only in -next then no Fixes needed, since there's no stable rev yet. Jiapeng, in future, please make sure to cc the author of related commits when reporting stuff like this :-) It helps people to update their patches. Song, you probably want to update your patch.
Hi Chris, On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:23 AM Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> wrote: > > +Cc: Song Thanks for the CC! > > Nathan Chancellor writes: > >On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:47:44PM +0000, Chris Down wrote: > >> Jiapeng Chong writes: > >> > The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called > >> > elsewhere, so remove this unused function. > >> > >> Huh? It's used by __module_text_address(), no? > > > >Not after commit 2ece476a2346 ("module: replace module_layout with > >module_memory") in -next. This patch should have a fixes tag, even if > >the warning is currently hidden behind W=1. > > Huh, I thought I had checked out latest -next, but must have not done so > somehow :-) Mea culpa. > > If it's only in -next then no Fixes needed, since there's no stable rev yet. > > Jiapeng, in future, please make sure to cc the author of related commits when > reporting stuff like this :-) It helps people to update their patches. > > Song, you probably want to update your patch. Luis, would you prefer a new patch with everything folded in? Or would you apply the patches on your end? Thanks, Song
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:57:09AM -0800, Song Liu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:23 AM Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> wrote: > > > > +Cc: Song > > Thanks for the CC! > > > > > Nathan Chancellor writes: > > >On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:47:44PM +0000, Chris Down wrote: > > >> Jiapeng Chong writes: > > >> > The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called > > >> > elsewhere, so remove this unused function. > > >> > > >> Huh? It's used by __module_text_address(), no? > > > > > >Not after commit 2ece476a2346 ("module: replace module_layout with > > >module_memory") in -next. This patch should have a fixes tag, even if > > >the warning is currently hidden behind W=1. > > > > Huh, I thought I had checked out latest -next, but must have not done so > > somehow :-) Mea culpa. > > > > If it's only in -next then no Fixes needed, since there's no stable rev yet. > > > > Jiapeng, in future, please make sure to cc the author of related commits when > > reporting stuff like this :-) It helps people to update their patches. > > > > Song, you probably want to update your patch. > > Luis, would you prefer a new patch with everything folded in? Or would > you apply the patches on your end? I've merged this patch separately onto modules-next and enhanced the commit log to explain its needed after your patch. Luis
diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c index c598f11e7016..062065568b40 100644 --- a/kernel/module/main.c +++ b/kernel/module/main.c @@ -3004,11 +3004,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags) return load_module(&info, uargs, flags); } -static inline int within(unsigned long addr, void *start, unsigned long size) -{ - return ((void *)addr >= start && (void *)addr < start + size); -} - /* Keep in sync with MODULE_FLAGS_BUF_SIZE !!! */ char *module_flags(struct module *mod, char *buf, bool show_state) {
The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called elsewhere, so remove this unused function. kernel/module/main.c:3007:19: warning: unused function 'within'. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> --- kernel/module/main.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)