| Message ID | 20230217210917.2649365-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 3a70e0d4c9d74cb00f7c0ec022f5599f9f7ba07d |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net] net: lan966x: Fix possible deadlock inside PTP | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 22:09:17 +0100 you wrote: > When doing timestamping in lan966x and having PROVE_LOCKING > enabled the following warning is shown. > > ======================================================== > WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected > 6.2.0-rc7-01749-gc54e1f7f7e36 #2786 Tainted: G N > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net] net: lan966x: Fix possible deadlock inside PTP https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/3a70e0d4c9d7 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c index ded9ab79ccc21..931e37b9a0ada 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c @@ -523,9 +523,9 @@ irqreturn_t lan966x_ptp_irq_handler(int irq, void *args) if (WARN_ON(!skb_match)) continue; - spin_lock(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock, flags); lan966x->ptp_skbs--; - spin_unlock(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock, flags); /* Get the h/w timestamp */ lan966x_get_hwtimestamp(lan966x, &ts, delay);
When doing timestamping in lan966x and having PROVE_LOCKING enabled the following warning is shown. ======================================================== WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected 6.2.0-rc7-01749-gc54e1f7f7e36 #2786 Tainted: G N -------------------------------------------------------- swapper/0/0 just changed the state of lock: c2609f50 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: (&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); lock(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock); <Interrupt> lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: c1001e18 ((&ndev->rs_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x0/0x33c #1: c105e7c4 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ndisc_send_skb+0x134/0x81c #2: c105e7d8 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip6_finish_output2+0x17c/0xc64 #3: c105e7d8 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x4c/0x1224 #4: c3056174 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x354/0x1224 the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: -> (&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 lan966x_ptp_irq_handler+0x164/0x2a8 irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread+0x130/0x278 kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 lan966x_ptp_irq_handler+0x164/0x2a8 irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread+0x130/0x278 kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x68 lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request+0x128/0x1cc lan966x_port_xmit+0x224/0x43c dev_hard_start_xmit+0xa8/0x2f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 packet_sendmsg+0xdb4/0x134c __sys_sendto+0xd0/0x154 sys_send+0x18/0x20 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c } ... key at: [<c174ba0c>] __key.2+0x0/0x8 ... acquired at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x68 lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request+0x128/0x1cc lan966x_port_xmit+0x224/0x43c dev_hard_start_xmit+0xa8/0x2f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 packet_sendmsg+0xdb4/0x134c __sys_sendto+0xd0/0x154 sys_send+0x18/0x20 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c -> (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2} { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 netif_freeze_queues+0x38/0x68 dev_deactivate_many+0xac/0x388 dev_deactivate+0x38/0x6c linkwatch_do_dev+0x70/0x8c __linkwatch_run_queue+0xd4/0x1e8 linkwatch_event+0x24/0x34 process_one_work+0x284/0x744 worker_thread+0x28/0x4bc kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 ip6_finish_output2+0x5f4/0xc64 ndisc_send_skb+0x4cc/0x81c addrconf_rs_timer+0xb0/0x2f8 call_timer_fn+0xb4/0x33c expire_timers+0xb4/0x10c run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x2a8 __do_softirq+0xd4/0x5fc __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x17c irq_exit+0x8/0x28 __irq_svc+0x90/0xbc arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x3c default_idle_call+0x44/0xac do_idle+0xc8/0x138 cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c rest_init+0xcc/0x168 arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 netif_freeze_queues+0x38/0x68 dev_deactivate_many+0xac/0x388 dev_deactivate+0x38/0x6c linkwatch_do_dev+0x70/0x8c __linkwatch_run_queue+0xd4/0x1e8 linkwatch_event+0x24/0x34 process_one_work+0x284/0x744 worker_thread+0x28/0x4bc kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 } ... key at: [<c175974c>] netdev_xmit_lock_key+0x8/0x1c8 ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x978/0x2978 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 ip6_finish_output2+0x5f4/0xc64 ndisc_send_skb+0x4cc/0x81c addrconf_rs_timer+0xb0/0x2f8 call_timer_fn+0xb4/0x33c expire_timers+0xb4/0x10c run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x2a8 __do_softirq+0xd4/0x5fc __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x17c irq_exit+0x8/0x28 __irq_svc+0x90/0xbc arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x3c default_idle_call+0x44/0xac do_idle+0xc8/0x138 cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c rest_init+0xcc/0x168 arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G N 6.2.0-rc7-01749-gc54e1f7f7e36 #2786 Hardware name: Generic DT based system unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from mark_lock.part.0+0x59c/0x93c mark_lock.part.0 from __lock_acquire+0x978/0x2978 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 _raw_spin_lock from sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 __dev_queue_xmit from ip6_finish_output2+0x5f4/0xc64 ip6_finish_output2 from ndisc_send_skb+0x4cc/0x81c ndisc_send_skb from addrconf_rs_timer+0xb0/0x2f8 addrconf_rs_timer from call_timer_fn+0xb4/0x33c call_timer_fn from expire_timers+0xb4/0x10c expire_timers from run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x2a8 run_timer_softirq from __do_softirq+0xd4/0x5fc __do_softirq from __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x17c __irq_exit_rcu from irq_exit+0x8/0x28 irq_exit from __irq_svc+0x90/0xbc Exception stack(0xc1001f20 to 0xc1001f68) 1f20: ffffffff ffffffff 00000001 c011f840 c100e000 c100e000 c1009314 c1009370 1f40: c10f0c1a c0d5e564 c0f5da8c 00000000 00000000 c1001f70 c010f0bc c010f0c0 1f60: 600f0013 ffffffff __irq_svc from arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x3c arch_cpu_idle from default_idle_call+0x44/0xac default_idle_call from do_idle+0xc8/0x138 do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xcc/0x168 rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 Fix this by using spin_lock_irqsave/spin_lock_irqrestore also inside lan966x_ptp_irq_handler. Fixes: e85a96e48e33 ("net: lan966x: Add support for ptp interrupts") Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)