From patchwork Sun Feb 19 06:13:25 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Namhyung Kim X-Patchwork-Id: 13145794 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089B6C05027 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 06:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229785AbjBSGNq (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2023 01:13:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229709AbjBSGNm (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2023 01:13:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0C6612870; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id mi8-20020a17090b4b4800b002349579949aso94916pjb.5; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:13:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tela1JcSrstwR5Y3qdh0xzenG3vdCFBGO917FRH3BrE=; b=QacD+bGBuCncEOh7buZX892WPlWggLIFbuWTTz/Kas650w/05nBxpfSFp0ylml0LgV LZsvevcjzU+OeJsHrZhQkI6xZFxied4VK1FbXgUXfchmzS79nOd5Gu5cQK6ILcpWUs9S ZKi4dg8AVBNsgR9fd3oOCgSj2TNfQ1Oe9QIQbK2AIRLdg0gbZ7V406BG0o6AvHpFTWQ7 NUz/B37XaZCIYlc8bHHXlfXQkGY7j335M23B/WxLZW+guCaRJTTtJd6ZgIEFchFA2wuo lsNw6fdwIb8wFNGGp7UbbAsZvvd6t9w/pbS8nxv5jK1iOH1GPUgOBdavbBLqBXWx+cpr kVdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tela1JcSrstwR5Y3qdh0xzenG3vdCFBGO917FRH3BrE=; b=E8tTBTGTO4msSPFgUskmnAUsoixmMDe0AxHKHW/y3Hr+iDX6uIhUe6n+sBYakZsI/c 8/wg7Jd6gqUaETSqVgiIh8390Z9OmMvxB2HkIHgwrUCy/Lqml3zsM915b9wd+b4mUmQd v7UDBJTgVRtDooR1FbChpTNDWa3Tz7iFIoouWuedgWK6EDaTYj+KSsbIykdigmBHskjS V8ibPuxh+A+VbUIH//uy8EiG0GgctRdKR2ychFtr/4gpqj9WX8KM+j0Z1NPUKZdIC8Xp smfW+ZiHCrvGdc10mJzBe72Aqyrh9FLF0EDKGj+c8hiE+OrvWXYVSJtVugxfeXB7q20q WT6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU8Ue3nFNXzdrtp1InYY3DHbaDJZPt3vMHw2ofYPtJjIwapt4u3 +uBfrPeOT1MWmYLUx94A7P8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+u03UUGGikTMt4ohdF+3VBfwLtB0DYOwL2XDVWVIxX4S1nilCuYljBKVWmQRpMce/RuUMS/g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f946:b0:19a:a9dd:ed3f with SMTP id kx6-20020a170902f94600b0019aa9dded3fmr2606233plb.49.1676787220059; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from moohyul.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2d4:203:70ac:ab5:11d3:d785]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16-20020a170902dad000b00189ac5a2340sm1182140plx.124.2023.02.18.22.13.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:13:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: Namhyung Kim From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Andi Kleen , Kan Liang , Song Liu , Stephane Eranian , Ravi Bangoria , Leo Yan , James Clark , Hao Luo , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 4/8] perf record: Record dropped sample count Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:13:25 -0800 Message-Id: <20230219061329.1001079-5-namhyung@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog In-Reply-To: <20230219061329.1001079-1-namhyung@kernel.org> References: <20230219061329.1001079-1-namhyung@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org When it uses bpf filters, event might drop some samples. It'd be nice if it can report how many samples it lost. As LOST_SAMPLES event can carry the similar information, let's use it for bpf filters. To indicate it's from BPF filters, add a new misc flag for that and do not display cpu load warnings. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h | 2 ++ tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++----------- tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 7 ++++++ tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 5 ++++ tools/perf/util/session.c | 3 ++- 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h index ad47d7b31046..51b9338f4c11 100644 --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct perf_record_lost { __u64 lost; }; +#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF (1 << 15) + struct perf_record_lost_samples { struct perf_event_header header; __u64 lost; diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c index 6429915d376d..d4037308209c 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c @@ -1865,24 +1865,16 @@ record__switch_output(struct record *rec, bool at_exit) return fd; } -static void __record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel, +static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost, - int cpu_idx, int thread_idx) + int cpu_idx, int thread_idx, u64 lost_count, + u16 misc_flag) { - struct perf_counts_values count; struct perf_sample_id *sid; struct perf_sample sample = {}; int id_hdr_size; - if (perf_evsel__read(&evsel->core, cpu_idx, thread_idx, &count) < 0) { - pr_err("read LOST count failed\n"); - return; - } - - if (count.lost == 0) - return; - - lost->lost = count.lost; + lost->lost = lost_count; if (evsel->core.ids) { sid = xyarray__entry(evsel->core.sample_id, cpu_idx, thread_idx); sample.id = sid->id; @@ -1891,6 +1883,7 @@ static void __record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel, id_hdr_size = perf_event__synthesize_id_sample((void *)(lost + 1), evsel->core.attr.sample_type, &sample); lost->header.size = sizeof(*lost) + id_hdr_size; + lost->header.misc = misc_flag; record__write(rec, NULL, lost, lost->header.size); } @@ -1914,6 +1907,7 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec) evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) { struct xyarray *xy = evsel->core.sample_id; + u64 lost_count; if (xy == NULL || evsel->core.fd == NULL) continue; @@ -1925,12 +1919,27 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec) for (int x = 0; x < xyarray__max_x(xy); x++) { for (int y = 0; y < xyarray__max_y(xy); y++) { - __record__read_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, x, y); + struct perf_counts_values count; + + if (perf_evsel__read(&evsel->core, x, y, &count) < 0) { + pr_err("read LOST count failed\n"); + goto out; + } + + if (count.lost) { + __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, + x, y, count.lost, 0); + } } } + + lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel); + if (lost_count) + __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0, 0, lost_count, + PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF); } +out: free(lost); - } static volatile sig_atomic_t workload_exec_errno; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c index f47420cf81c9..11fb391c92e9 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel) return 0; } +u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel) +{ + struct sample_filter_bpf *skel = evsel->bpf_skel; + + return skel ? skel->bss->dropped : 0; +} + struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags, enum perf_bpf_filter_op op, unsigned long val) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h index 6077930073f9..36b44c8188ab 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flag int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str); int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel); int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel); +u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel); #else /* !HAVE_BPF_SKEL */ @@ -38,5 +39,9 @@ static inline int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel) { return -ENOSYS; } +static inline u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel) +{ + return 0; +} #endif /* HAVE_BPF_SKEL*/ #endif /* PERF_UTIL_BPF_FILTER_H */ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c index 749d5b5c135b..7d8d057d1772 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c @@ -1582,7 +1582,8 @@ static int machines__deliver_event(struct machines *machines, evlist->stats.total_lost += event->lost.lost; return tool->lost(tool, event, sample, machine); case PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES: - if (tool->lost_samples == perf_event__process_lost_samples) + if (tool->lost_samples == perf_event__process_lost_samples && + !(event->header.misc & PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF)) evlist->stats.total_lost_samples += event->lost_samples.lost; return tool->lost_samples(tool, event, sample, machine); case PERF_RECORD_READ: