diff mbox series

[5/8] perf bpf filter: Add 'pid' sample data support

Message ID 20230222230141.1729048-6-namhyung@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series perf record: Implement BPF sample filter (v3) | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17

Commit Message

Namhyung Kim Feb. 22, 2023, 11:01 p.m. UTC 
The pid is special because it's saved in the PERF_SAMPLE_TID together.
So it needs to differenciate tid and pid using the 'part' field in the
perf bpf filter entry struct.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c                 |  4 +++-
 tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h                 |  3 ++-
 tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l                 | 11 ++++++++++-
 tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y                 |  7 +++++--
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h     |  3 ++-
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c |  5 ++++-
 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 660db5ccd3da..3501c7cc4d32 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@  int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel)
 	list_for_each_entry(expr, &evsel->bpf_filters, list) {
 		struct perf_bpf_filter_entry entry = {
 			.op = expr->op,
+			.part = expr->part,
 			.flags = expr->sample_flags,
 			.value = expr->val,
 		};
@@ -76,7 +77,7 @@  u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel)
 	return skel ? skel->bss->dropped : 0;
 }
 
-struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags,
+struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags, int part,
 						       enum perf_bpf_filter_op op,
 						       unsigned long val)
 {
@@ -85,6 +86,7 @@  struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flag
 	expr = malloc(sizeof(*expr));
 	if (expr != NULL) {
 		expr->sample_flags = sample_flags;
+		expr->part = part;
 		expr->op = op;
 		expr->val = val;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
index 36b44c8188ab..4fb33d296d9c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ 
 struct perf_bpf_filter_expr {
 	struct list_head list;
 	enum perf_bpf_filter_op op;
+	int part;
 	unsigned long sample_flags;
 	unsigned long val;
 };
@@ -16,7 +17,7 @@  struct perf_bpf_filter_expr {
 struct evsel;
 
 #ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
-struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags,
+struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags, int part,
 						       enum perf_bpf_filter_op op,
 						       unsigned long val);
 int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l
index f6c0b74ea285..ec12fc4d2ab8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l
@@ -11,7 +11,15 @@ 
 
 static int sample(unsigned long sample_flag)
 {
-	perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample = sample_flag;
+	perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.type = sample_flag;
+	perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.part = 0;
+	return BFT_SAMPLE;
+}
+
+static int sample_part(unsigned long sample_flag, int part)
+{
+	perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.type = sample_flag;
+	perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.part = part;
 	return BFT_SAMPLE;
 }
 
@@ -56,6 +64,7 @@  ident		[_a-zA-Z][_a-zA-Z0-9]+
 ip		{ return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_IP); }
 id		{ return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_ID); }
 tid		{ return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_TID); }
+pid		{ return sample_part(PERF_SAMPLE_TID, 1); }
 cpu		{ return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_CPU); }
 time		{ return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_TIME); }
 addr		{ return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR); }
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y
index 13eca612ecca..0ca6532afd8d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y
@@ -20,7 +20,10 @@  static void perf_bpf_filter_error(struct list_head *expr __maybe_unused,
 %union
 {
 	unsigned long num;
-	unsigned long sample;
+	struct {
+		unsigned long type;
+		int part;
+	} sample;
 	enum perf_bpf_filter_op op;
 	struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *expr;
 }
@@ -48,7 +51,7 @@  filter_term
 filter_term:
 BFT_SAMPLE BFT_OP BFT_NUM
 {
-	$$ = perf_bpf_filter_expr__new($1, $2, $3);
+	$$ = perf_bpf_filter_expr__new($1.type, $1.part, $2, $3);
 }
 
 %%
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
index 862060bfda14..6b9fd554ad7b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@  enum perf_bpf_filter_op {
 /* BPF map entry for filtering */
 struct perf_bpf_filter_entry {
 	enum perf_bpf_filter_op op;
-	__u64 flags;
+	__u32 part; /* sub-sample type info when it has multiple values */
+	__u64 flags; /* perf sample type flags */
 	__u64 value;
 };
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
index c07256279c3e..dddf38c27bb7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
@@ -40,7 +40,10 @@  static inline __u64 perf_get_sample(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *kctx,
 	case PERF_SAMPLE_ID:
 		return kctx->data->id;
 	case PERF_SAMPLE_TID:
-		return kctx->data->tid_entry.tid;
+		if (entry->part)
+			return kctx->data->tid_entry.pid;
+		else
+			return kctx->data->tid_entry.tid;
 	case PERF_SAMPLE_CPU:
 		return kctx->data->cpu_entry.cpu;
 	case PERF_SAMPLE_TIME: