diff mbox series

[bpf-next,16/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c converted to inline assembly

Message ID 20230325025524.144043-17-eddyz87@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit a58475a98903c756a7f731cffdf20242ed17b9b0
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Eduard Zingerman March 25, 2023, 2:54 a.m. UTC 
Test verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c       | 181 --------------
 3 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 36fdede7dcab..29351c774ee2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ 
 #include "verifier_cgroup_skb.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_cgroup_storage.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_const_or.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_ctx_sk_msg.skel.h"
 
 __maybe_unused
 static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -48,3 +49,4 @@  void test_verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode(void)   { RUN(verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode)
 void test_verifier_cgroup_skb(void)           { RUN(verifier_cgroup_skb); }
 void test_verifier_cgroup_storage(void)       { RUN(verifier_cgroup_storage); }
 void test_verifier_const_or(void)             { RUN(verifier_const_or); }
+void test_verifier_ctx_sk_msg(void)           { RUN(verifier_ctx_sk_msg); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..65edc89799f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access family in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void access_family_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_family]);		\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_family, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_ip4_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip4]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip4, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_ip4_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip4]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip4, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access remote_port in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_port_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_port]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_port, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access local_port in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_port_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_port]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_port, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb")
+__description("valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_ip6_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_0]);	\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_1]);	\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_2]);	\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_3]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_1, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_2, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_3, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3]))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb")
+__description("valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_ip6_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_0]);	\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_1]);	\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_2]);	\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_3]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_1, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_2, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_3, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3]))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access size in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void access_size_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_size]);		\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_size, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void of_size_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_size]);		\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_size, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid read past end of SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__naked void past_end_of_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]);			\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid read offset in SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void read_offset_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]);			\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("direct packet read for SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void packet_read_for_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0);				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("direct packet write for SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void packet_write_for_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	*(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2;				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void direct_packet_access_sk_msg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r1 = r2;					\
+	r1 += 6;					\
+	if r1 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = *(u16*)(r2 + 6);				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+	  __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
deleted file mode 100644
index c6c69220a569..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@ 
-{
-	"valid access family in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"valid access remote_port in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"valid access local_port in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3])),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
-},
-{
-	"valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3])),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
-},
-{
-	"valid access size in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
-	"invalid read past end of SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"invalid read offset in SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
-	"direct packet read for SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"direct packet write for SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
-	"overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},