diff mbox series

[bpf-next,6/8] bpf: Allowlist few fields similar to __rcu tag.

Message ID 20230404045029.82870-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 30ee9821f9430c34a6254134a5f0e8db227510be
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Follow up to RCU enforcement in the verifier. | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 28 this patch: 28
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 8 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com yhs@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 18 this patch: 18
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 28 this patch: 28
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 100 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Alexei Starovoitov April 4, 2023, 4:50 a.m. UTC 
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Allow bpf program access cgrp->kn, mm->exe_file, skb->sk, req->sk.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4e7d671497f4..fd90ba498ccc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5378,6 +5378,7 @@  static int bpf_map_direct_read(struct bpf_map *map, int off, int size, u64 *val)
 }
 
 #define BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(__type)  __PASTE(__type, __safe_rcu)
+#define BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(__type)  __PASTE(__type, __safe_rcu_or_null)
 #define BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED(__type)  __PASTE(__type, __safe_trusted)
 
 /*
@@ -5394,10 +5395,31 @@  BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(struct task_struct) {
 	struct task_struct *group_leader;
 };
 
+BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(struct cgroup) {
+	/* cgrp->kn is always accessible as documented in kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c */
+	struct kernfs_node *kn;
+};
+
 BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(struct css_set) {
 	struct cgroup *dfl_cgrp;
 };
 
+/* RCU trusted: these fields are trusted in RCU CS and can be NULL */
+BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(struct mm_struct) {
+	struct file __rcu *exe_file;
+};
+
+/* skb->sk, req->sk are not RCU protected, but we mark them as such
+ * because bpf prog accessible sockets are SOCK_RCU_FREE.
+ */
+BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(struct sk_buff) {
+	struct sock *sk;
+};
+
+BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(struct request_sock) {
+	struct sock *sk;
+};
+
 /* full trusted: these fields are trusted even outside of RCU CS and never NULL */
 BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED(struct bpf_iter_meta) {
 	struct seq_file *seq;
@@ -5430,11 +5452,23 @@  static bool type_is_rcu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			const char *field_name, u32 btf_id)
 {
 	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(struct task_struct));
+	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(struct cgroup));
 	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU(struct css_set));
 
 	return btf_nested_type_is_trusted(&env->log, reg, field_name, btf_id, "__safe_rcu");
 }
 
+static bool type_is_rcu_or_null(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+				struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+				const char *field_name, u32 btf_id)
+{
+	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(struct mm_struct));
+	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(struct sk_buff));
+	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU_OR_NULL(struct request_sock));
+
+	return btf_nested_type_is_trusted(&env->log, reg, field_name, btf_id, "__safe_rcu_or_null");
+}
+
 static bool type_is_trusted(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			    struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
 			    const char *field_name, u32 btf_id)
@@ -5561,9 +5595,10 @@  static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			if (type_is_rcu(env, reg, field_name, btf_id)) {
 				/* ignore __rcu tag and mark it MEM_RCU */
 				flag |= MEM_RCU;
-			} else if (flag & MEM_RCU) {
+			} else if (flag & MEM_RCU ||
+				   type_is_rcu_or_null(env, reg, field_name, btf_id)) {
 				/* __rcu tagged pointers can be NULL */
-				flag |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
+				flag |= MEM_RCU | PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
 			} else if (flag & (MEM_PERCPU | MEM_USER)) {
 				/* keep as-is */
 			} else {