diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,2/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for non-constant cond_op NE/EQ bound deduction

Message ID 20230406164500.1045715-1-yhs@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit aec08d677b4d0adeb7412fa98547cf07bfce6fea
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Improve verifier for cond_op and spilled loop index variables | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: eddyz87@gmail.com mykolal@fb.com song@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 18 this patch: 18
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: line length of 101 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Yonghong Song April 6, 2023, 4:45 p.m. UTC 
Add various tests for code pattern '<non-const> NE/EQ <const>' implemented
in the previous verifier patch. Without the verifier patch, these new
tests will fail.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c     | 179 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko April 6, 2023, 8:37 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:47 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Add various tests for code pattern '<non-const> NE/EQ <const>' implemented
> in the previous verifier patch. Without the verifier patch, these new
> tests will fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---

Makes sense.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
>  .../verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c     | 179 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c
>

[...]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index efc8cf2e18d0..73dff693d411 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ 
 #include "verifier_array_access.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_basic_stack.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_bounds_deduction.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_cfg.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode.skel.h"
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@  void test_verifier_and(void)                  { RUN(verifier_and); }
 void test_verifier_array_access(void)         { RUN(verifier_array_access); }
 void test_verifier_basic_stack(void)          { RUN(verifier_basic_stack); }
 void test_verifier_bounds_deduction(void)     { RUN(verifier_bounds_deduction); }
+void test_verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const(void)     { RUN(verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const); }
 void test_verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign(void) { RUN(verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign); }
 void test_verifier_cfg(void)                  { RUN(verifier_cfg); }
 void test_verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode(void)   { RUN(verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fe570d866139
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, <non_const> == <const>, 1")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_1(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if r0 < 3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r2 = 2;						\
+	if r0 == r2 goto l1_%=;				\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, <non_const> == <const>, 2")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_2(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if r0 > 3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r2 = 4;						\
+	if r0 == r2 goto l1_%=;				\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, <non_const> != <const>, 1")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_3(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if r0 < 3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r2 = 2;						\
+	if r0 != r2 goto l0_%=;				\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, <non_const> != <const>, 2")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_4(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if r0 > 3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r2 = 4;						\
+	if r0 != r2 goto l0_%=;				\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, <non_const> == <const>, 1")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_5(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if w0 < 4 goto l0_%=;				\
+	w2 = 3;						\
+	if w0 == w2 goto l1_%=;				\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, <non_const> == <const>, 2")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_6(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if w0 > 4 goto l0_%=;				\
+	w2 = 5;						\
+	if w0 == w2 goto l1_%=;				\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, <non_const> != <const>, 1")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_7(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if w0 < 3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	w2 = 2;						\
+	if w0 != w2 goto l0_%=;				\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, <non_const> != <const>, 2")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_8(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];			\
+	if w0 > 3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	w2 = 4;						\
+	if w0 != w2 goto l0_%=;				\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	r0 -= r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";