diff mbox series

[bpf-next,23/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_illegal_alu converted to inline assembly

Message ID 20230421174234.2391278-24-eddyz87@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit efe25a330b106f39e5d27760cc57def3e8c5a3f9
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Second set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 pending Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 pending Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Eduard Zingerman April 21, 2023, 5:42 p.m. UTC 
Test verifier/value_illegal_alu automatically converted to use inline assembly.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c    | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c          |  95 -----------
 3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 94405bf00b47..56b9248a15c0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ 
 #include "verifier_unpriv_perf.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_value_adj_spill.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_value.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_value_illegal_alu.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_value_or_null.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_var_off.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_xadd.skel.h"
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@  void test_verifier_unpriv(void)               { RUN(verifier_unpriv); }
 void test_verifier_unpriv_perf(void)          { RUN(verifier_unpriv_perf); }
 void test_verifier_value_adj_spill(void)      { RUN(verifier_value_adj_spill); }
 void test_verifier_value(void)                { RUN(verifier_value); }
+void test_verifier_value_illegal_alu(void)    { RUN(verifier_value_illegal_alu); }
 void test_verifier_value_or_null(void)        { RUN(verifier_value_or_null); }
 void test_verifier_var_off(void)              { RUN(verifier_var_off); }
 void test_verifier_xadd(void)                 { RUN(verifier_xadd); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..71814a753216
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
+
+struct test_val {
+	unsigned int index;
+	int foo[MAX_ENTRIES];
+};
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, long long);
+	__type(value, struct test_val);
+} map_hash_48b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 1")
+__failure __msg("R0 bitwise operator &= on pointer")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_1(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1;				\
+	r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll;			\
+	call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];			\
+	if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 &= 8;					\
+	r1 = 22;					\
+	*(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1;				\
+l0_%=:	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+	  __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 2")
+__failure __msg("R0 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_2(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1;				\
+	r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll;			\
+	call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];			\
+	if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
+	w0 += 0;					\
+	r1 = 22;					\
+	*(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1;				\
+l0_%=:	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+	  __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 3")
+__failure __msg("R0 pointer arithmetic with /= operator")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_3(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1;				\
+	r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll;			\
+	call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];			\
+	if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 /= 42;					\
+	r1 = 22;					\
+	*(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1;				\
+l0_%=:	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+	  __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 4")
+__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_4(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1;				\
+	r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll;			\
+	call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];			\
+	if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = be64 r0;					\
+	r1 = 22;					\
+	*(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1;				\
+l0_%=:	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+	  __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 5")
+__failure __msg("R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'")
+__msg_unpriv("leaking pointer from stack off -8")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_5(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1;				\
+	r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll;			\
+	call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];			\
+	if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r3 = 4096;					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	*(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r0;				\
+	lock *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) += r3;			\
+	r0 = *(u64*)(r2 + 0);				\
+	r1 = 22;					\
+	*(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1;				\
+l0_%=:	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+	  __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c
deleted file mode 100644
index d6f29eb4bd57..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@ 
-{
-	"map element value illegal alu op, 1",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
-	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
-	.errstr = "R0 bitwise operator &= on pointer",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"map element value illegal alu op, 2",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
-	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
-	BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
-	.errstr = "R0 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"map element value illegal alu op, 3",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
-	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, 42),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
-	.errstr = "R0 pointer arithmetic with /= operator",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"map element value illegal alu op, 4",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
-	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
-	BPF_ENDIAN(BPF_FROM_BE, BPF_REG_0, 64),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
-	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
-	.errstr = "invalid mem access 'scalar'",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
-	"map element value illegal alu op, 5",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
-	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 4096),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
-	.errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8",
-	.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},