From patchwork Tue May 9 01:50:28 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tejun Heo X-Patchwork-Id: 13235289 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E71383 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 01:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE9EA26E; Mon, 8 May 2023 18:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ab0c697c2bso49726325ad.1; Mon, 08 May 2023 18:50:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683597053; x=1686189053; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lP5IaIFdiCV3CLFQyofnNGbKobWaxQ8hETIzTLkOsHM=; b=IuzHeRYk9bZCJjY+c51BTwSfwNB3YJPrwNIPsXNAYGwynBe5GubLNbMQUh3GkPIOx1 ABfJV/ZnmRKgJM6p5LnQWxKslcwTg9CUpSJjjkc+11iRUCyaGTcwxShndkiTqlidzp41 dVrrF2zYq0a86ifYSpcqfu8MOK6rWMIYJn9suM7zv/mgxVvwCqXCRTDGuaxQuY3FMYe8 QAD6dgtLiBySt4uA3CL/zd/ocT5WWm/G6xQ+gqrebAlZvFbAlIiAsWiG4G5bzBQ3BLMr 7GKmdD5ou02+spSYoQ7FJjl383SXdeENzKhNCYO/Wd7MbUIwC0BrvRLFZo5zYqo4w9zW 486w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683597053; x=1686189053; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lP5IaIFdiCV3CLFQyofnNGbKobWaxQ8hETIzTLkOsHM=; b=UKu+3zAbhr0PmycHDId26v2RFBG1vUWYca/NwZg/wAqkOvp8j8+8h+ugBGWF9HNaVq eTLg2up3q2dUGctEyNPVxIYjgzTTcEf9UvVsyR9Xd93ia++Lor3z4fJgYQcKxvM5doES y1Fwc2KPeT9Z8ng+4xWngPMZRj6wzOLmFTrBJsbfaT9s1LZZV2tFiOQqe1EbF1bkHYAJ pz8NhsOib37NWm9WEqRnHXHoXXCscQtTf9kdsoi5UUGnOKd2IGsBmLtBXPw2JMyLTQab GdfoJEFg2cNOcpoygyffKqkD2jrrZsTHua1ZOsDZ3UonAhbdIPErnQsXWtmiUQ9dxUT6 iV9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzhoYqSj3OlsPANQytFN7NvPLFF6VjYVbo7H896ia3vLDCw8YiP 6NELDi2ls7fK25k4P+JZudw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4ITCiXUXq8qffdksAkMo2gD+tX6SA8ac8w9NL+1hHgfMb58opbrOs2qVpb1OWg5QV+TvJyrg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f816:b0:1a9:3916:c2d1 with SMTP id ix22-20020a170902f81600b001a93916c2d1mr13097348plb.54.1683597053120; Mon, 08 May 2023 18:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (2603-800c-1a02-1bae-a7fa-157f-969a-4cde.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:800c:1a02:1bae:a7fa:157f:969a:4cde]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bb5-20020a170902bc8500b001ab05aaae2fsm149237plb.107.2023.05.08.18.50.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 May 2023 18:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo From: Tejun Heo To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo , Manivannan Sadhasivam , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 09/13] net: qrtr: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() to create ordered workqueues Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 15:50:28 -1000 Message-Id: <20230509015032.3768622-10-tj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230509015032.3768622-1-tj@kernel.org> References: <20230509015032.3768622-1-tj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org BACKGROUND ========== When multiple work items are queued to a workqueue, their execution order doesn't match the queueing order. They may get executed in any order and simultaneously. When fully serialized execution - one by one in the queueing order - is needed, an ordered workqueue should be used which can be created with alloc_ordered_workqueue(). However, alloc_ordered_workqueue() was a later addition. Before it, an ordered workqueue could be obtained by creating an UNBOUND workqueue with @max_active==1. This originally was an implementation side-effect which was broken by 4c16bd327c74 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered"). Because there were users that depended on the ordered execution, 5c0338c68706 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered") made workqueue allocation path to implicitly promote UNBOUND workqueues w/ @max_active==1 to ordered workqueues. While this has worked okay, overloading the UNBOUND allocation interface this way creates other issues. It's difficult to tell whether a given workqueue actually needs to be ordered and users that legitimately want a min concurrency level wq unexpectedly gets an ordered one instead. With planned UNBOUND workqueue updates to improve execution locality and more prevalence of chiplet designs which can benefit from such improvements, this isn't a state we wanna be in forever. This patch series audits all callsites that create an UNBOUND workqueue w/ @max_active==1 and converts them to alloc_ordered_workqueue() as necessary. WHAT TO LOOK FOR ================ The conversions are from alloc_workqueue(WQ_UNBOUND | flags, 1, args..) to alloc_ordered_workqueue(flags, args...) which don't cause any functional changes. If you know that fully ordered execution is not ncessary, please let me know. I'll drop the conversion and instead add a comment noting the fact to reduce confusion while conversion is in progress. If you aren't fully sure, it's completely fine to let the conversion through. The behavior will stay exactly the same and we can always reconsider later. As there are follow-up workqueue core changes, I'd really appreciate if the patch can be routed through the workqueue tree w/ your acks. Thanks. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Paolo Abeni Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org --- net/qrtr/ns.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c index 0f25a386138c..0f7a729f1a1f 100644 --- a/net/qrtr/ns.c +++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ int qrtr_ns_init(void) goto err_sock; } - qrtr_ns.workqueue = alloc_workqueue("qrtr_ns_handler", WQ_UNBOUND, 1); + qrtr_ns.workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("qrtr_ns_handler", 0); if (!qrtr_ns.workqueue) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto err_sock;