diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v6,1/4] bpf: Don't EFAULT for {g,s}setsockopt with wrong optlen

Message ID 20230511170456.1759459-2-sdf@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 29ebbba7d46136cba324264e513a1e964ca16c0a
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Don't EFAULT for {g,s}setsockopt with wrong optlen | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 22 this patch: 22
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 12 of 12 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 20 this patch: 20
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 22 this patch: 22
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 41 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 12 this patch: 12
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Stanislav Fomichev May 11, 2023, 5:04 p.m. UTC
With the way the hooks implemented right now, we have a special
condition: optval larger than PAGE_SIZE will expose only first 4k into
BPF; any modifications to the optval are ignored. If the BPF program
doesn't handle this condition by resetting optlen to 0,
the userspace will get EFAULT.

The intention of the EFAULT was to make it apparent to the
developers that the program is doing something wrong.
However, this inadvertently might affect production workloads
with the BPF programs that are not too careful (i.e., returning EFAULT
for perfectly valid setsockopt/getsockopt calls).

Let's try to minimize the chance of BPF program screwing up userspace
by ignoring the output of those BPF programs (instead of returning
EFAULT to the userspace). pr_info_once those cases to
the dmesg to help with figuring out what's going wrong.

Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index a06e118a9be5..14c870595428 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -1826,6 +1826,12 @@  int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int *level,
 		ret = 1;
 	} else if (ctx.optlen > max_optlen || ctx.optlen < -1) {
 		/* optlen is out of bounds */
+		if (*optlen > PAGE_SIZE && ctx.optlen >= 0) {
+			pr_info_once("bpf setsockopt: ignoring program buffer with optlen=%d (max_optlen=%d)\n",
+				     ctx.optlen, max_optlen);
+			ret = 0;
+			goto out;
+		}
 		ret = -EFAULT;
 	} else {
 		/* optlen within bounds, run kernel handler */
@@ -1881,8 +1887,10 @@  int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
 		.optname = optname,
 		.current_task = current,
 	};
+	int orig_optlen;
 	int ret;
 
+	orig_optlen = max_optlen;
 	ctx.optlen = max_optlen;
 	max_optlen = sockopt_alloc_buf(&ctx, max_optlen, &buf);
 	if (max_optlen < 0)
@@ -1905,6 +1913,7 @@  int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
 			ret = -EFAULT;
 			goto out;
 		}
+		orig_optlen = ctx.optlen;
 
 		if (copy_from_user(ctx.optval, optval,
 				   min(ctx.optlen, max_optlen)) != 0) {
@@ -1922,6 +1931,12 @@  int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
 		goto out;
 
 	if (optval && (ctx.optlen > max_optlen || ctx.optlen < 0)) {
+		if (orig_optlen > PAGE_SIZE && ctx.optlen >= 0) {
+			pr_info_once("bpf getsockopt: ignoring program buffer with optlen=%d (max_optlen=%d)\n",
+				     ctx.optlen, max_optlen);
+			ret = retval;
+			goto out;
+		}
 		ret = -EFAULT;
 		goto out;
 	}