diff mbox series

[bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Check whether to run selftest

Message ID 20230525232248.640465-1-deso@posteo.net (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 321a64b328156fd43d3be589c24905a641c7995b
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Check whether to run selftest | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 12 maintainers not CCed: yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com sdf@google.com shuah@kernel.org song@kernel.org wangyufen@huawei.com mykolal@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org haoluo@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 pending Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 pending Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 pending Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Daniel Müller May 25, 2023, 11:22 p.m. UTC 
The sockopt test invokes test__start_subtest and then unconditionally
asserts the success. That means that even if deny-listed, any test will
still run and potentially fail.
Evaluate the return value of test__start_subtest() to achieve the
desired behavior, as other tests do.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org May 26, 2023, midnight UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 25 May 2023 23:22:48 +0000 you wrote:
> The sockopt test invokes test__start_subtest and then unconditionally
> asserts the success. That means that even if deny-listed, any test will
> still run and potentially fail.
> Evaluate the return value of test__start_subtest() to achieve the
> desired behavior, as other tests do.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Check whether to run selftest
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/321a64b32815

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
index 33dd45..9e6a5e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,9 @@  void test_sockopt(void)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
-		test__start_subtest(tests[i].descr);
+		if (!test__start_subtest(tests[i].descr))
+			continue;
+
 		ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i]), tests[i].descr);
 	}