diff mbox series

[net-next,v2,02/15] ice: register devlink port for PF with ops

Message ID 20230526102841.2226553-3-jiri@resnulli.us (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b2857685372bb0ac5c8b2d5079cd8126aeef1e6b
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series devlink: move port ops into separate structure | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 18 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Jiri Pirko May 26, 2023, 10:28 a.m. UTC
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>

Use newly introduce devlink port registration function variant and
register devlink port passing ops.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Wilczynski, Michal May 26, 2023, 10:52 a.m. UTC | #1
On 5/26/2023 12:28 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>
> Use newly introduce devlink port registration function variant and
> register devlink port passing ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
> index bc44cc220818..6661d12772a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
> @@ -1512,6 +1512,9 @@ ice_devlink_set_port_split_options(struct ice_pf *pf,
>  	ice_active_port_option = active_idx;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct devlink_port_ops ice_devlink_port_ops = {
> +};

I can see that you're doing this everywhere, but aren't those braces redundant ?
This struct would be initialized to zero anyway.

> +
>  /**
>   * ice_devlink_create_pf_port - Create a devlink port for this PF
>   * @pf: the PF to create a devlink port for
> @@ -1551,7 +1554,8 @@ int ice_devlink_create_pf_port(struct ice_pf *pf)
>  	devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, &attrs);
>  	devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
>  
> -	err = devlink_port_register(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx);
> +	err = devlink_port_register_with_ops(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx,
> +					     &ice_devlink_port_ops);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to create devlink port for PF %d, error %d\n",
>  			pf->hw.pf_id, err);

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
Jiri Pirko May 26, 2023, 11:35 a.m. UTC | #2
Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:52:21PM CEST, michal.wilczynski@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 5/26/2023 12:28 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Use newly introduce devlink port registration function variant and
>> register devlink port passing ops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
>> index bc44cc220818..6661d12772a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
>> @@ -1512,6 +1512,9 @@ ice_devlink_set_port_split_options(struct ice_pf *pf,
>>  	ice_active_port_option = active_idx;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static const struct devlink_port_ops ice_devlink_port_ops = {
>> +};
>
>I can see that you're doing this everywhere, but aren't those braces redundant ?
>This struct would be initialized to zero anyway.

Well, yeah, but 3 patches later, they are not going to be empty anymore.


>
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * ice_devlink_create_pf_port - Create a devlink port for this PF
>>   * @pf: the PF to create a devlink port for
>> @@ -1551,7 +1554,8 @@ int ice_devlink_create_pf_port(struct ice_pf *pf)
>>  	devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, &attrs);
>>  	devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
>>  
>> -	err = devlink_port_register(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx);
>> +	err = devlink_port_register_with_ops(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx,
>> +					     &ice_devlink_port_ops);
>>  	if (err) {
>>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to create devlink port for PF %d, error %d\n",
>>  			pf->hw.pf_id, err);
>
>Looks good to me,
>
>Reviewed-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
index bc44cc220818..6661d12772a3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
@@ -1512,6 +1512,9 @@  ice_devlink_set_port_split_options(struct ice_pf *pf,
 	ice_active_port_option = active_idx;
 }
 
+static const struct devlink_port_ops ice_devlink_port_ops = {
+};
+
 /**
  * ice_devlink_create_pf_port - Create a devlink port for this PF
  * @pf: the PF to create a devlink port for
@@ -1551,7 +1554,8 @@  int ice_devlink_create_pf_port(struct ice_pf *pf)
 	devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, &attrs);
 	devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
 
-	err = devlink_port_register(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx);
+	err = devlink_port_register_with_ops(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx,
+					     &ice_devlink_port_ops);
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to create devlink port for PF %d, error %d\n",
 			pf->hw.pf_id, err);