diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,2/4] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for nested_trust

Message ID 20230713025642.27477-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit d2284d68259c8816fc0dbcb89a0e56849e1f24c2
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Fix errors in verifying a union | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: mykolal@fb.com void@manifault.com shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 18 this patch: 18
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 98 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

Yafang Shao July 13, 2023, 2:56 a.m. UTC
Add selftests for nested_strust to check whehter PTR_UNTRUSTED is cleared
as expected, the result as follows:

 #141/1   nested_trust/test_read_cpumask:OK
 #141/2   nested_trust/test_skb_field:OK                    <<<<
 #141/3   nested_trust/test_invalid_nested_user_cpus:OK
 #141/4   nested_trust/test_invalid_nested_offset:OK
 #141/5   nested_trust/test_invalid_skb_field:OK            <<<<
 #141     nested_trust:OK

The #141/2 and #141/5 are newly added.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_success.c   | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c
index 0d1aa6bbace4..ea39497f11ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ 
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE);
+	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, u64);
+} sk_storage_map SEC(".maps");
+
 /* Prototype for all of the program trace events below:
  *
  * TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
@@ -31,3 +38,12 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_invalid_nested_offset, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla
 	bpf_cpumask_first_zero(&task->cpus_mask);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/* Although R2 is of type sk_buff but sock_common is expected, we will hit untrusted ptr first. */
+SEC("tp_btf/tcp_probe")
+__failure __msg("R2 type=untrusted_ptr_ expected=ptr_, trusted_ptr_, rcu_ptr_")
+int BPF_PROG(test_invalid_skb_field, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, skb->next, 0, 0);
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_success.c
index 886ade4aa99d..833840bffd3b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_success.c
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ 
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE);
+	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, u64);
+} sk_storage_map SEC(".maps");
+
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
 __success
 int BPF_PROG(test_read_cpumask, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
@@ -17,3 +24,11 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_read_cpumask, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 	bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, task->cpus_ptr);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("tp_btf/tcp_probe")
+__success
+int BPF_PROG(test_skb_field, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, skb->sk, 0, 0);
+	return 0;
+}