diff mbox series

[RFC,bpf-next,1/4] bpf: Add __bpf_iter_attach_cgroup()

Message ID 20230716121046.17110-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Introduce cgroup_task iter | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1344 this patch: 1344
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 12 of 12 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1367 this patch: 1367
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 50 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Yafang Shao July 16, 2023, 12:10 p.m. UTC 
This is a preparation for the followup patch. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
index 810378f04fbc..619c13c30e87 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
@@ -191,21 +191,14 @@  static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info cgroup_iter_seq_info = {
 	.seq_priv_size		= sizeof(struct cgroup_iter_priv),
 };
 
-static int bpf_iter_attach_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog,
-				  union bpf_iter_link_info *linfo,
-				  struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
+static int __bpf_iter_attach_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+				    union bpf_iter_link_info *linfo,
+				    struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
 {
 	int fd = linfo->cgroup.cgroup_fd;
 	u64 id = linfo->cgroup.cgroup_id;
-	int order = linfo->cgroup.order;
 	struct cgroup *cgrp;
 
-	if (order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE &&
-	    order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST &&
-	    order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP &&
-	    order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_SELF_ONLY)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (fd && id)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -220,10 +213,25 @@  static int bpf_iter_attach_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		return PTR_ERR(cgrp);
 
 	aux->cgroup.start = cgrp;
-	aux->cgroup.order = order;
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int bpf_iter_attach_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+				  union bpf_iter_link_info *linfo,
+				  struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
+{
+	int order = linfo->cgroup.order;
+
+	if (order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE &&
+	    order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST &&
+	    order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP &&
+	    order != BPF_CGROUP_ITER_SELF_ONLY)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	aux->cgroup.order = order;
+	return __bpf_iter_attach_cgroup(prog, linfo, aux);
+}
+
 static void bpf_iter_detach_cgroup(struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
 {
 	cgroup_put(aux->cgroup.start);