diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,4/4] bpf: allow any program to use the bpf_map_sum_elem_count kfunc

Message ID 20230719092952.41202-5-aspsk@isovalent.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 72829b1c1f1601015cd7332b968befcf5e636c24
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series allow bpf_map_sum_elem_count for all program types | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1345 this patch: 1345
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 16 of 16 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1368 this patch: 1368
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary

Commit Message

Anton Protopopov July 19, 2023, 9:29 a.m. UTC 
Register the bpf_map_sum_elem_count func for all programs, and update the
map_ptr subtest of the test_progs test to test the new functionality.

The usage is allowed as long as the pointer to the map is trusted (when
using tracing programs) or is a const pointer to map, as in the following
example:

    struct {
            __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
            ...
    } hash SEC(".maps");

    ...

    static inline int some_bpf_prog(void)
    {
            struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *)&hash;
            __s64 count;

            count = bpf_map_sum_elem_count(map);

            ...
    }

Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/map_iter.c                            | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/map_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/map_iter.c
index 011adb41858e..6fc9dae9edc8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/map_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/map_iter.c
@@ -226,6 +226,6 @@  static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_map_iter_kfunc_set = {
 
 static int init_subsystem(void)
 {
-	return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_map_iter_kfunc_set);
+	return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, &bpf_map_iter_kfunc_set);
 }
 late_initcall(init_subsystem);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
index db388f593d0a..3325da17ec81 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@  struct {
 	__type(value, __u32);
 } m_hash SEC(".maps");
 
+__s64 bpf_map_sum_elem_count(struct bpf_map *map) __ksym;
+
 static inline int check_hash(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_htab *hash = (struct bpf_htab *)&m_hash;
@@ -115,6 +117,8 @@  static inline int check_hash(void)
 	VERIFY(hash->elem_size == 64);
 
 	VERIFY(hash->count.counter == 0);
+	VERIFY(bpf_map_sum_elem_count(map) == 0);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < HALF_ENTRIES; ++i) {
 		const __u32 key = i;
 		const __u32 val = 1;
@@ -123,6 +127,7 @@  static inline int check_hash(void)
 			return 0;
 	}
 	VERIFY(hash->count.counter == HALF_ENTRIES);
+	VERIFY(bpf_map_sum_elem_count(map) == HALF_ENTRIES);
 
 	return 1;
 }