diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpf, x86: initialize the variable "first_off" in save_args()

Message ID 20230719110330.2007949-1-imagedong@tencent.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 492e797fdab25f2d8eb1b6bb3236f4aac474f878
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpf, x86: initialize the variable "first_off" in save_args() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 22 of 22 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1367 this patch: 1367
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Menglong Dong July 19, 2023, 11:03 a.m. UTC
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>

As Dan Carpenter reported, the variable "first_off" which is passed to
clean_stack_garbage() in save_args() can be uninitialized, which can
cause runtime warnings with KMEMsan. Therefore, init it with 0.

Fixes: 473e3150e30a ("bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING")
Cc: Hao Peng <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/09784025-a812-493f-9829-5e26c8691e07@moroto.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org July 19, 2023, 5 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 19:03:30 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> 
> As Dan Carpenter reported, the variable "first_off" which is passed to
> clean_stack_garbage() in save_args() can be uninitialized, which can
> cause runtime warnings with KMEMsan. Therefore, init it with 0.
> 
> Fixes: 473e3150e30a ("bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING")
> Cc: Hao Peng <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/09784025-a812-493f-9829-5e26c8691e07@moroto.mountain/
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf, x86: initialize the variable "first_off" in save_args()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/492e797fdab2

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 5ab531be56ac..83c4b45dc65f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@  static int get_nr_used_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m)
 static void save_args(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog,
 		      int stack_size, bool for_call_origin)
 {
-	int arg_regs, first_off, nr_regs = 0, nr_stack_slots = 0;
+	int arg_regs, first_off = 0, nr_regs = 0, nr_stack_slots = 0;
 	int i, j;
 
 	/* Store function arguments to stack.