Message ID | 20230719183734.21681-19-larysa.zaremba@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | XDP metadata via kfuncs for ice | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for bpf-next, async |
netdev/apply | fail | Patch does not apply to bpf-next |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR | success | PR summary |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 | success | Logs for ShellCheck |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 | success | Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 | success | Logs for build for s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 | success | Logs for set-matrix |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 | success | Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 | success | Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 | success | Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 | success | Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 | success | Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 | success | Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 | success | Logs for veristat |
On 07/19, Larysa Zaremba wrote: > __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag() is used in veth XDP hints implementation, > its return value (-EINVAL if skb is not VLAN tagged) is passed to bpf code, > but XDP hints specification requires drivers to return -ENODATA, if a hint > cannot be provided for a particular packet. > > Solve this inconsistency by changing error return value of > __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag() from -EINVAL to -ENODATA, do the same thing to > __vlan_get_tag(), because this function is supposed to follow the same > convention. This, in turn, makes -ENODATA the only non-zero value > vlan_get_tag() can return. We can do this with no side effects, because > none of the users of the 3 above-mentioned functions rely on the exact > value. > > Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> > --- > include/linux/if_vlan.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h > index 6ba71957851e..fb35d7dd77a2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h > +++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h > @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline int __vlan_get_tag(const struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *vlan_tci) > struct vlan_ethhdr *veth = skb_vlan_eth_hdr(skb); > > if (!eth_type_vlan(veth->h_vlan_proto)) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENODATA; > > *vlan_tci = ntohs(veth->h_vlan_TCI); > return 0; > @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static inline int __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag(const struct sk_buff *skb, > return 0; > } else { > *vlan_tci = 0; > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENODATA; > } > } > > -- > 2.41.0 >
diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h index 6ba71957851e..fb35d7dd77a2 100644 --- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h +++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline int __vlan_get_tag(const struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *vlan_tci) struct vlan_ethhdr *veth = skb_vlan_eth_hdr(skb); if (!eth_type_vlan(veth->h_vlan_proto)) - return -EINVAL; + return -ENODATA; *vlan_tci = ntohs(veth->h_vlan_TCI); return 0; @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static inline int __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag(const struct sk_buff *skb, return 0; } else { *vlan_tci = 0; - return -EINVAL; + return -ENODATA; } }
__vlan_hwaccel_get_tag() is used in veth XDP hints implementation, its return value (-EINVAL if skb is not VLAN tagged) is passed to bpf code, but XDP hints specification requires drivers to return -ENODATA, if a hint cannot be provided for a particular packet. Solve this inconsistency by changing error return value of __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag() from -EINVAL to -ENODATA, do the same thing to __vlan_get_tag(), because this function is supposed to follow the same convention. This, in turn, makes -ENODATA the only non-zero value vlan_get_tag() can return. We can do this with no side effects, because none of the users of the 3 above-mentioned functions rely on the exact value. Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> --- include/linux/if_vlan.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)