Message ID | 20230720113550.369257-16-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | bpf: Add multi uprobe link | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for bpf-next, async |
netdev/apply | fail | Patch does not apply to bpf-next |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR | success | PR summary |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 | success | Logs for ShellCheck |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 | success | Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 | success | Logs for build for s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 | success | Logs for set-matrix |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 | success | Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 | success | Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 | success | Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 | success | Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 | success | Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 | success | Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 | success | Logs for veristat |
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 7a10a8b57dbc..527f02960156 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -8680,6 +8680,7 @@ static int attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_lin static int attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link); static int attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link); static int attach_kprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link); +static int attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link); static int attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link); static int attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link); @@ -8695,6 +8696,10 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = { SEC_DEF("uretprobe.s+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe), SEC_DEF("kprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe_multi), SEC_DEF("kretprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe_multi), + SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi), + SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi), + SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi), + SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi), SEC_DEF("ksyscall+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall), SEC_DEF("kretsyscall+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall), SEC_DEF("usdt+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_usdt), @@ -10897,6 +10902,37 @@ static int attach_kprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, stru return libbpf_get_error(*link); } +static int attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link) +{ + char *probe_type = NULL, *binary_path = NULL, *func_name = NULL; + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_multi_opts, opts); + int n, ret = -EINVAL; + + *link = NULL; + + n = sscanf(prog->sec_name, "%m[^/]/%m[^:]:%ms", + &probe_type, &binary_path, &func_name); + switch (n) { + case 1: + /* handle SEC("u[ret]probe") - format is valid, but auto-attach is impossible. */ + ret = 0; + break; + case 3: + opts.retprobe = strcmp(probe_type, "uretprobe.multi") == 0; + *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, -1, binary_path, func_name, &opts); + ret = libbpf_get_error(*link); + break; + default: + pr_warn("prog '%s': invalid format of section definition '%s'\n", prog->name, + prog->sec_name); + break; + } + free(probe_type); + free(binary_path); + free(func_name); + return ret; +} + static void gen_uprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz, const char *binary_path, uint64_t offset) {