diff mbox series

[PATCHv4,bpf-next,28/28] selftests/bpf: Add extra link to uprobe_multi tests

Message ID 20230720113550.369257-29-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add multi uprobe link | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa July 20, 2023, 11:35 a.m. UTC
Attaching extra program to same functions system wide for api
and link tests.

This way we can test the pid filter works properly when there's
extra system wide consumer on the same uprobe that will trigger
the original uprobe handler.

We expect to have the same counts as before.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c          | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c  |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 3267a1a458a6..485e3c8c885f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -183,6 +183,12 @@  __test_attach_api(const char *binary, const char *pattern, struct bpf_uprobe_mul
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.uretprobe_sleep, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
+	opts->retprobe = false;
+	skel->links.uprobe_extra = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.uprobe_extra, -1,
+								    binary, pattern, opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.uprobe_extra, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
 	uprobe_multi_test_run(skel, child);
 
 cleanup:
@@ -239,6 +245,7 @@  static void __test_link_api(struct child *child)
 		"uprobe_multi_func_2",
 		"uprobe_multi_func_3",
 	};
+	int link_extra_fd = -1;
 	int err;
 
 	err = elf_resolve_syms_offsets(path, 3, syms, (unsigned long **) &offsets);
@@ -277,6 +284,14 @@  static void __test_link_api(struct child *child)
 	link4_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, &opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(link4_fd, 0, "link4_fd"))
 		goto cleanup;
+
+	opts.kprobe_multi.flags = 0;
+	opts.uprobe_multi.pid = 0;
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.uprobe_extra);
+	link_extra_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(link_extra_fd, 0, "link_extra_fd"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
 	uprobe_multi_test_run(skel, child);
 
 cleanup:
@@ -288,6 +303,8 @@  static void __test_link_api(struct child *child)
 		close(link3_fd);
 	if (link4_fd >= 0)
 		close(link4_fd);
+	if (link_extra_fd >= 0)
+		close(link_extra_fd);
 
 	uprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
 	free(offsets);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
index ec648a6699e6..419d9aa28fce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
@@ -93,3 +93,9 @@  int uretprobe_sleep(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	uprobe_multi_check(ctx, true, true);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("uprobe.multi//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_*")
+int uprobe_extra(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}