diff mbox series

[net,v5] bonding: Remove error checking for debugfs_create_dir()

Message ID 20230726112913.4393-1-machel@vivo.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net,v5] bonding: Remove error checking for debugfs_create_dir() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present fail Series targets non-next tree, but doesn't contain any Fixes tags
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1342 this patch: 1342
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 7 of 7 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 9 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Wang Ming July 26, 2023, 11:29 a.m. UTC
It is expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors
return by debugfs_create_dir() in bond_debug_reregister().

Signed-off-by: Wang Ming <machel@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Greg KH July 26, 2023, 11:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:29:00PM +0800, Wang Ming wrote:
> It is expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors
> return by debugfs_create_dir() in bond_debug_reregister().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Ming <machel@vivo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> index 594094526..a41f76542 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ void bond_debug_reregister(struct bonding *bond)
>  void bond_create_debugfs(void)
>  {
>  	bonding_debug_root = debugfs_create_dir("bonding", NULL);
> -
> -	if (!bonding_debug_root)
> -		pr_warn("Warning: Cannot create bonding directory in debugfs\n");
>  }
>  
>  void bond_destroy_debugfs(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot
Jay Vosburgh July 26, 2023, 8:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On 7/26/23, Wang Ming <machel@vivo.com> wrote:
> It is expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors
> return by debugfs_create_dir() in bond_debug_reregister().

I'm confused; I recall that the prior version kept the pr_warn(), but
changed the
test from a NULL check  to instead use IS_ERR().  I'll state again
that I think printing the error is useful, as it would provide an
indication of why the debugfs directory isn't available.  I also don't
see an obvious way the error could be used to spam the dmesg.

        -J


>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Ming <machel@vivo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> index 594094526..a41f76542 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
> @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ void bond_debug_reregister(struct bonding *bond)
>  void bond_create_debugfs(void)
>  {
>  	bonding_debug_root = debugfs_create_dir("bonding", NULL);
> -
> -	if (!bonding_debug_root)
> -		pr_warn("Warning: Cannot create bonding directory in debugfs\n");
>  }
>
>  void bond_destroy_debugfs(void)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
index 594094526..a41f76542 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
@@ -87,9 +87,6 @@  void bond_debug_reregister(struct bonding *bond)
 void bond_create_debugfs(void)
 {
 	bonding_debug_root = debugfs_create_dir("bonding", NULL);
-
-	if (!bonding_debug_root)
-		pr_warn("Warning: Cannot create bonding directory in debugfs\n");
 }
 
 void bond_destroy_debugfs(void)