diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,11/17] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension load insns

Message ID 20230726220827.1100979-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict

Commit Message

Yonghong Song July 26, 2023, 10:08 p.m. UTC
Add unit tests for new ldsx insns. The test includes sign-extension
with a single value or with a value range.

If cpuv4 is not supported due to
  (1) older compiler, e.g., less than clang version 18, or
  (2) test runner test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32 which tests
      cpu v2 and v3, or
  (3) non-x86_64 arch not supporting new insns in jit yet,
a dummy program is added with below output:
  #318/1   verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test:OK
  #318     verifier_ldsx:OK
to indicate the test passed with a dummy test instead of actually
testing cpuv4. I am using a dummy prog to avoid changing the
verifier testing infrastructure. Once clang 18 is widely available
and other architectures support cpuv4, at least for CI run,
the dummy program can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c       | 131 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index c375e59ff28d..6eec6a9463c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ 
 #include "verifier_int_ptr.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_jeq_infer_not_null.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_ld_ind.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_ldsx.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_leak_ptr.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_loops1.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_lwt.skel.h"
@@ -133,6 +134,7 @@  void test_verifier_helper_value_access(void)  { RUN(verifier_helper_value_access
 void test_verifier_int_ptr(void)              { RUN(verifier_int_ptr); }
 void test_verifier_jeq_infer_not_null(void)   { RUN(verifier_jeq_infer_not_null); }
 void test_verifier_ld_ind(void)               { RUN(verifier_ld_ind); }
+void test_verifier_ldsx(void)                  { RUN(verifier_ldsx); }
 void test_verifier_leak_ptr(void)             { RUN(verifier_leak_ptr); }
 void test_verifier_loops1(void)               { RUN(verifier_loops1); }
 void test_verifier_lwt(void)                  { RUN(verifier_lwt); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3c3d1bddd67f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ldsx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) && __clang_major__ >= 18
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("LDSX, S8")
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(-2)
+__naked void ldsx_s8(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = 0x3fe;					\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;				\
+	r0 = *(s8 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("LDSX, S16")
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(-2)
+__naked void ldsx_s16(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = 0x3fffe;					\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;				\
+	r0 = *(s16 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("LDSX, S32")
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(-1)
+__naked void ldsx_s32(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = 0xfffffffe;				\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;				\
+	r0 = *(s32 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	r0 >>= 1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged")
+__log_level(2) __success __retval(1)
+__msg("R1_w=scalar(smin=-128,smax=127)")
+__naked void ldsx_s8_range_priv(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r0;				\
+	r1 = *(s8 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	/* r1 with s8 range */				\
+	if r1 s> 0x7f goto l0_%=;			\
+	if r1 s< -0x80 goto l0_%=;			\
+	r0 = 1;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	exit;						\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 2;						\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("LDSX, S16 range checking")
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(1)
+__naked void ldsx_s16_range(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r0;				\
+	r1 = *(s16 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	/* r1 with s16 range */				\
+	if r1 s> 0x7fff goto l0_%=;			\
+	if r1 s< -0x8000 goto l0_%=;			\
+	r0 = 1;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	exit;						\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 2;						\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("LDSX, S32 range checking")
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(1)
+__naked void ldsx_s32_range(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r0;				\
+	r1 = *(s32 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	/* r1 with s16 range */				\
+	if r1 s> 0x7fffFFFF goto l0_%=;			\
+	if r1 s< -0x80000000 goto l0_%=;		\
+	r0 = 1;						\
+l1_%=:							\
+	exit;						\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 2;						\
+	goto l1_%=;					\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test")
+__success
+int dummy_test(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";